4.5 Article

Spatial interactions and optimal forest management on a fire-threatened landscape

Journal

FOREST POLICY AND ECONOMICS
Volume 83, Issue -, Pages 107-120

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2017.07.006

Keywords

Wildland fire; Spatial; Ecological disturbance; Risk; Approximate dynamic programming; Reinforcement learning; Forestry

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation under CyberSEES Computing and Visualizing Optimal Policies for Ecosystem Management [1331932]
  2. Direct For Computer & Info Scie & Enginr
  3. Division of Computing and Communication Foundations [1331932, 1521687] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Forest management in the face of fire risk is a challenging problem because fire spreads across a landscape and because its occurrence is unpredictable. Accounting for the existence of stochastic events that generate spatial interactions in the context of a dynamic decision process is crucial for determining optimal management. This paper demonstrates a method for incorporating spatial information and interactions into management decisions made over time. A machine learning technique called approximate dynamic programming is applied to determine the optimal timing and location of fuel treatments and timber harvests for a fire-threatened landscape. Larger net present values can be achieved using policies that explicitly consider evolving spatial interactions created by fire spread, compared to policies that ignore the spatial dimension of the inter-temporal optimization problem.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
Article Economics

Whose forest? A two-level collective action perspective on struggles to reach polycentric governance

Sara Lorenzini, Nadia von Jacobi

Summary: This paper fills the gap in the literature on polycentric governance by focusing on the micro-processes of conflict that precede its establishment. Through a comparative analysis of four case studies, the authors find that conflict can lead to negotiations and the eventual establishment of common procedural rules, which can sustain polycentric governance.

FOREST POLICY AND ECONOMICS (2024)

Article Economics

Was stakeholder participation in the PEFC revision process successful in Slovakia?

Hubert Palus, Lenka Marcinekova, Jaroslav Salka

Summary: The complexity and comprehensiveness of sustainability issues in forest certification schemes require knowledge based and transparent decision-making processes, which involve open and multi-stakeholder participation. This study examines the latest PEFC national sustainable forest management standard revision process in Slovakia from the viewpoint of stakeholder participation. The results highlight the importance of stakeholder understanding, trust, and satisfaction in the effectiveness of the revision process.

FOREST POLICY AND ECONOMICS (2024)

Article Economics

Developing community-based criteria for sustaining non-timber forest products: A case study with the Missanabie Cree First Nation

Nicholas Palaschuk, Jason Gauthier, Ryan Bullock

Summary: Non-timber forest products (NTFPs) are important for the spiritual and cultural identity of Indigenous communities, but current forest policies in Canada do not adequately protect these resources. This research used a participatory approach and community interviews to document local criteria, elements, and values related to NTFP development and conservation. The resulting framework can guide decision making and promote socio-economic benefits for the Missanabie Cree First Nation.

FOREST POLICY AND ECONOMICS (2024)

Article Economics

The coalitional politics of the European Union Regulation on deforestation-free products

Laila Berning, Metodi Sotirov

Summary: This paper analyzes the coalition politics driven by beliefs and interests in the new European Union Regulation on deforestation-free products (EUDR). The study identifies pro-regulation and contra-regulation coalitions and highlights the strategic alliance formed between pro-EUDR business actors and other pro-coalitions. Despite opposition from a weaker contra-regulation coalition, the EUDR was ultimately institutionalized as a compromise solution accommodating different beliefs and interests of state and non-state actors.

FOREST POLICY AND ECONOMICS (2024)

Article Economics

Is there a future for smallholder farmers in bioeconomy? The case of 'improved' seeds in South Punjab, Pakistan

Mehwish Zuberi, Michael Spies, Jonas o. Nielsen

Summary: Smallholder farmers play a crucial role in agrarian value chains in the Global South, but they are often neglected in technology-oriented agricultural interventions. However, they face challenges such as lack of resources, established crop rotation patterns, and market and climatic factors.

FOREST POLICY AND ECONOMICS (2024)

Article Economics

Harnessing the full potential of a global forest-based bioeconomy through non-timber products: Beyond logs, biotechnology, and high-income countries

James Chamberlain, Carsten Smith-Hall

Summary: More countries are adopting novel approaches to transition to a forest-based bioeconomy, which can address global challenges such as sustainable forest management, poverty alleviation, and climate change mitigation. Utilizing non-timber forest products is crucial for the realization of a forest-based bioeconomy.

FOREST POLICY AND ECONOMICS (2024)

Article Economics

Commercial timber plantations and community livelihoods: Insights from comparative case studies in southern Laos

Keith Barney

Summary: The social impacts of industrial wood plantations in Southeast Asia, specifically in Laos, are debated. This study finds that under certain conditions, these plantations can positively contribute to local livelihoods, but there are still issues of land dispossession and inadequate compensation.

FOREST POLICY AND ECONOMICS (2024)