4.7 Article

Evaluation of the safety of a genetically modified DAS-44406-6 soybean meal and hulls in a 90-day dietary toxicity study in rats

Journal

FOOD AND CHEMICAL TOXICOLOGY
Volume 109, Issue -, Pages 245-252

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fct.2017.08.048

Keywords

DAS-44406-6; Genetically-modified soybean; Subchronic rat; Transgenic soybean; Herbicide tolerant; Aryloxyalkanoate dioxygenase

Funding

  1. Dow AgroSciences, LLC

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A 90-day sub chronic toxicity study was conducted in rats to evaluate the safety of genetically modified DAS-44406-6 soybeans expressing herbicide tolerant proteins when compared with its conventional comparators (non-transgenic near isoline control soybean and three commercially available non-transgenic line control soybeans). Rats were given diets formulated with either 10% or 20% w/w of soybean meal and 1% or 2% hulls of DAS-44406-6 soybean with an equivalent amount of hulls from an isoline non-transgenic control soybean for at least 90 days. In addition, three separate 20% w/w non-transgenic commercially available soybean varieties were also given to groups of rats to serve as reference controls. Animals were evaluated by cage-side and hand-held detailed clinical observations, ophthalmic examinations, body weights/body weight gains, feed consumption, hematology, prothrombin time, urinalysis, clinical chemistry, selected organ weights, and gross and histopathologic examinations. Under the conditions of this study, the genetically modified DAS-44406-6 diets did not cause any treatment-related effects in rats following 90 days of dietary administration as compared with rats fed diets with soybean of isoline control or commercial reference controls and are considered equivalent to the diets prepared from conventional comparators. (C) 2017 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available