4.1 Article

Assessing the genetic legacy of a rare, clonal Australian shrub Grevillea infecunda (Proteaceae)

Journal

FOLIA GEOBOTANICA
Volume 52, Issue 3-4, Pages 387-400

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s12224-016-9258-8

Keywords

clonal distribution; environmental change; microsatellites; Proteaceae; sterility

Categories

Funding

  1. Alcoa Australia
  2. Cybec Foundation
  3. Willis Summer Studentship

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Reliance on clonal reproduction is associated with an increased risk of extinction. Grevillea infecunda is a rare, putatively sterile shrub restricted to 11 populations in a localized coastal region of south-eastern Australia. We assessed the genetic diversity, clonal diversity and spatial distribution of clones in all populations of G. infecunda to guide conservation management. Eight chloroplast haplotypes were identified from the trnL - trnF and trnQ - rps16 intergenic spacer regions. All individuals belonged to a single maternal lineage dominated by one haplotype (95/111 samples). Minor haplotypes differed from the common haplotype only by single mutational steps. However, microsatellite markers revealed 89 multilocus genotypes (MLGs) in 38 multilocus lineages (MLLs) of variable size. MLLs were not shared among populations and ramets from different MLLs rarely intermingled physically. New shoots arising after fire were confirmed to belong to previously-existing MLLs, indicating that this species exhibits adaptation to fire. Genetically similar MLGs were more likely to be found in close proximity than less similar MLGs, resulting in significant spatial autocorrelation to ca 350 m. Genetic diversity was moderate but genotypic diversity was low once likely clonality was taken into account. Clonality appears to have arisen several times within the holly-leafed grevilleas and examining G. infecunda is a step towards understanding why and how often clonality occurs, and the long-term evolutionary outcomes of this life history.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available