4.5 Article

Multi-scale quantification of the effects of temperature on size at maturity in the American lobster (Homarus americanus)

Journal

FISHERIES RESEARCH
Volume 186, Issue -, Pages 397-406

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.fishres.2016.09.008

Keywords

Size at maturity; Temperature gradient; Scales; Homarus americanus

Categories

Funding

  1. NSF's Coastal SEES Program [OCE- 1325484]
  2. Directorate For Geosciences
  3. Division Of Ocean Sciences [1325369] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  4. Directorate For Geosciences
  5. Division Of Ocean Sciences [1325484] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Like most ectothermic species, American lobster growing in warmer environments mature at smaller sizes. A formal quantification of this pattern at multiple spatiotemporal scales has not been developed, impeding the development of tools to predict the impacts of climate change on American lobster life history and fishery. In this study, data from sea sampling programs from southern New England to the Bay of Fundy are used to estimate female lobster size at maturity, and to quantify the effects of water temperature on maturity at three spatial scales: i) regional (similar to 1000 km), ii) stock (100 s km), and iii) Statistical Area (10 s km). Results: show that female lobsters living in warmer waters mature at smaller sizes and that other factors, likely fishing, also contributed to the observed decrease in length at 50% maturity. This study suggests that adaptive management plans need to consider temperature-induced trends in size at maturity to ensure sustainability of the valuable American lobster fisheries. Additionally, this study provides a maturity function for use in models that aim to project effects of climate change on American lobster populations and fisheries dynamics. Crown Copyright (C) 2016 Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available