4.5 Article

The effects of surgically implanted dummy tags on the survival, growth performance, and physiology of pikeperch (Sander lucioperca)

Journal

FISH PHYSIOLOGY AND BIOCHEMISTRY
Volume 43, Issue 4, Pages 999-1010

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10695-017-0347-2

Keywords

Blood biochemistry; Dummy transmitter; Tissue adhesive; Pikeperch; Radio telemetry; Suture

Funding

  1. Inland Fisheries Institute in Olsztyn [IRS-046-35/-1.1/1/2016, S-028]
  2. [24/2011]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The aim of this work was to determine the impact of surgically implanted telemetry transmitters (TTs) on the growth, survival, hematological and biochemical indexes, and wound healing in juvenile pikeperch (Sander lucioperca) (body weight 60-90 g). Two incision suturing methods were used-silk sutures (experiment I-group ST) or tissue adhesive (experiment II-group GT). After tagging, the fish were held in a recirculating system for 35 days. No statistically significant differences were noted in the growth or condition indexes analyzed among the fish tagged with TT compared with those from the control groups (untagged). Substantial individual variability was noted, however, in the parameters examined in both the control and tagged groups. Among the hematological indexes, statistically significant differences were only noted in experiment I. Lower values of mean corpuscular volume and mean corpuscular hemoglobin were noted in group ST. Among the biochemical parameters, creatinine was statistically significantly threefold lower, magnesium and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) levels were lower, and ammonia levels were higher in group ST than in the control group. In experiment II, significant differences were only noted for ALP. Tissue adhesive was the superior and more effective method for closing the incision after TT implantation in juvenile pikeperch. This type of suturing facilitated faster healing, and it had less of an impact on juvenile pikeperch welfare.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available