4.7 Article

Mannose receptor is highly expressed by peritoneal dendritic cells in endometriosis

Journal

FERTILITY AND STERILITY
Volume 107, Issue 1, Pages 167-+

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.09.036

Keywords

Endometriosis; dendritic cell; peritoneal fluid; phagocyte; retrograde menstruation

Funding

  1. Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare
  2. Ministry of Education
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [15K20129, 26462478] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives: To characterize peritoneal dendritic cells (DCs) in endometriosis and to clarify their role in its etiology. Design: Experimental. Setting: University hospital. Patient(s): Sixty-three women (35 patients with endometriosis and 28 control women) who had undergone laparoscopic surgery. Intervention(s): Peritoneal DCs from endometriosis and control samples were analyzed for the expression of cell surface markers. Monocyte-derived dendritic cells (Mo-DCs) were cultured with dead endometrial stromal cells (dESCs) to investigate changes in phagocytic activity and cytokine expression. Main Outcome Measure(s): Cell surface markers and cytokine expression and identification with the use of flow cytometry or reversetranscription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Changes in cytokine expression and phagocytic activity of Mo-DCs cultured with dESCs and D-mannan were measured with the use of flow cytometry and RT-PCR. Result(s): The proportion of mannose receptor (MR)-positive myeloid DC type 1 was higher in endometriosis samples than in control samples. The blocking of MR reduced phagocytosis of dESCs by Mo-DCs. Mo-DCs cultured with dESCs expressed higher levels of interleukin (IL) 1 beta and IL-6 than control samples. Conclusion(s): Peritoneal DCs in endometriosis tissue express high levels of MR, which promotes phagocytosis of dead endometrial cells and thereby contributes to the etiology of endometriosis. (C) 2016 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available