4.7 Article

Impaired liver regeneration after hepatectomy and bleeding is associated with a shift from hepatocyte proliferation to hypertrophy

Journal

FASEB JOURNAL
Volume 31, Issue 12, Pages 5283-5295

Publisher

FEDERATION AMER SOC EXP BIOL
DOI: 10.1096/fj.201700153R

Keywords

hypoxia-inducible factor; liver failure; mTOR

Funding

  1. Israel Science Foundation [1157/12]
  2. European Society of Anesthesiology
  3. Israeli Health Ministry [3-10999]
  4. German Israel Foundation [I-1318-422.13/2015]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Extensive liver resections are common, and bleeding is frequent in these operations. Impaired regeneration after partial hepatectomy (PHx) may contribute to liver failure. We thus assessed the impact of acute bleeding on the liver regeneration progress after PHx and explored possible contributing molecular mechanisms. In rats, the regeneration progress was delayed and attenuated with PHx and bleeding and was not restored with colloid resuscitation. Livers restored their initial volume by postoperative day (POD) 2 after PHx through hepatocyte proliferation vs. POD 4 in the PHx and bleeding group, primarily by hepatocyte hypertrophy. With bleeding, hepatocyte proliferation was hindered in two mechanisms: by inhibiting cells from starting proliferation and by causing hindrance in G(1)/S progression. Liver hypoxia was prominent, with significant prolonged up-regulation of hypoxia-inducible factors (HIF) and HIF-targeted genes only in the PHx and bleeding group. Gene expression profiling revealed alterations in numerous genes that belong to critical pathways, including cell cycle, DNA replication, PI3K-Akt, purine, and pyrimidine metabolism. Because liver surgery is frequently performed in patients with a predamaged liver, an improper regenerative process after PHx and bleeding might lead to decompensation. The results hint at specific pathways to target in order to improve liver regeneration during PHx and bleeding.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available