4.5 Review

An update on the molecular diagnosis of congenital heart disease: focus on loss-of-function mutations

Journal

EXPERT REVIEW OF MOLECULAR DIAGNOSTICS
Volume 17, Issue 4, Pages 393-401

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/14737159.2017.1300062

Keywords

Congenital heart disease; molecular genetics; gene mutation; loss of function; genetic testing

Categories

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81470372]
  2. Key Program for Basic Research of Shanghai, China [14JC1405500]
  3. Major Project of Shanghai Chest Hospital, China [2014YZDH10102]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Introduction: Congenital heart disease (CHD) is the most common birth defect in humans. In spite of tremendous advance in medical care, CHD is still a major contributor to substantial morbidity and mortality. Aggregating evidence demonstrates that genetic defects play a pivotal role in the pathogenesis of CHD, and an increasing number of genetic mutations have been identified to be responsible for CHD.Areas covered: This paper is restricted to the molecular diagnosis of CHD, and highlights loss-of-function mutations in the genes associated with CHD. The newly-made progress in the molecular genetics of CHD is reviewed in this article.Expert commentary: Heart development is a precisely-coordinated biological process, involving in cellular proliferation, differentiation, migration, and integrated morphogenetic interactions, and interruption of this process predominantly by genetic risk factors leads to CHD. To date, mutations in over 60 genes have been causally linked to CHD, of which most mutations cause a loss-of-function effect. Using next generation sequencing technology and data processing software, new CHD-associated genes will be more easily discovered. Identification of the CHD-causative genes is of significant importance in genetic diagnosis, early prophylaxis and personalized treatment of CHD patients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available