4.5 Review

Blood biomarkers of kidney transplant rejection, an endless search?

Journal

EXPERT REVIEW OF MOLECULAR DIAGNOSTICS
Volume 17, Issue 7, Pages 687-697

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS AS
DOI: 10.1080/14737159.2017.1337512

Keywords

Biomarker; kidney transplantation; lymphocyte; personalized medicine; rejection

Categories

Funding

  1. Fondation Centaure
  2. French government [ANR-10-IBHU-005]
  3. Nantes Metropole
  4. Pays de la Loire Region
  5. VISICORT project - European Union's Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration [602470]
  6. National Research Agency [ANR-11-LABX-0016-01]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Introduction: The tailoring of immunosuppressive treatment is recognized as a promising strategy to improve long-term kidney graft outcome. To guide the standard care of transplant recipients, physicians need objective biomarkers that can identify an ongoing pathology with the graft or low intensity signals that will be later evolved to accelerated transplant rejection. The early identification of 'high-risk/low-risk' patients enables the adjustment of standard of caring, including managing the frequency of clinical visits and the immunosuppression dosing. Given their ease of availability and the compatibility with a large technical array, blood-based biomarkers have been widely scrutinized for use as potential predictive and diagnostic biomarkers. Areas covered: Here, the authors report on non-invasive biomarkers, such as modification of immune cell subsets and mRNA and miRNA profiles, identified in the blood of kidney transplant recipients collected before or after transplantation. Expert commentary: Combined with functional tests, the identification of biomarkers will improve our understanding of pathological processes and will contribute to a global improvement in clinical management.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available