4.2 Article Proceedings Paper

Real-world palbociclib dosing patterns and implications for drug costs in the treatment of HR+/HER2-metastatic breast cancer

Journal

EXPERT OPINION ON PHARMACOTHERAPY
Volume 18, Issue 12, Pages 1167-1178

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/14656566.2017.1351947

Keywords

Costs; dosing patterns; drug wastage; HR+/HER2-; metastatic breast cancer; palbociclib; real-world

Funding

  1. Novartis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: This study described real-world palbociclib dosing patterns and associated impacts on treatment costs for HR+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer (mBC) in the US.Methods: Postmenopausal women with HR+/HER2- mBC who initiated palbociclib-based therapy (initiation date=index date) between 02/03/2015 (palbociclib approval) and 02/29/2016, and continuous quarterly activity 1year before and 6months after the index date, were identified in the Symphony Health Solutions database. Rates of 1) dose reduction (25mg dose decrease/daily), and 2) reduction or interruption (>60 day gap in continuous drug supply) were assessed using Kaplan-Meier analyses. Drug wastage cost was estimated based on overlapping days between two prescription fills: the last original dose fill and the first reduced dose fill.Results: 1,242 patients initiated palbociclib-based therapy (mean age=62.7years, median follow-up=8.7months). During the 12-month post-index period, across the first four lines, dose reduction rates were 31.9-33.7% and dose reduction/interruption rates were 63.5-80.9%. A total of 411 (33.1%) patients changed dose, among whom 128 (31.1%) experienced prescription fill overlap (average=11.1days). Mean potential drug wastage cost among patients with fill overlap was $5,471.Conclusions: Most patients receiving palbociclib experienced dose reduction or interruption early in treatment; the associated drug wastage may lead to considerable costs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available