4.1 Article

ON-FARM TRIALS FOR DEVELOPMENT IMPACT? THE ORGANISATION OF RESEARCH AND THE SCALING OF AGRICULTURAL TECHNOLOGIES

Journal

EXPERIMENTAL AGRICULTURE
Volume 55, Issue 2, Pages 163-184

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S0014479717000382

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Royal Netherlands Embassy in Addis Ababa (CASCAPE)
  2. CGIAR Research Program on MAIZE
  3. CGIAR Research Program on WHEAT
  4. USAID/Bangladesh (CSISA-BD)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Changes in donor priorities have meant that agronomists working in the tropics find themselves in a fundamentally new operational space, one that demands rapid improvements in farmers' livelihoods resulting from the large-scale adoption of new technologies and crop management practices. As a result, on-farm trials in contemporary Agricultural Research for Development (AR4D) are increasingly implemented both to collect data and to spur farmer adoption. We examine the different interpretations and organisational practices of AR4D organisations in this new operational space, and reflect on the usefulness of on-farm trials for agricultural technology scaling. Three case studies are presented to address these questions - two in sub-Saharan Africa and one in South Asia. Each study is considered in light of Science and Technology Studies theory and locates science as a politically situated practice, recognising the tension that scientists face between providing evidence and persuading selected audiences. The case studies show that this tension results in the introduction of several biases that limit the scalability of the technologies under investigation. These include biases at the level of the trial location, host-farmer selection, trial design, management and evaluation. We conclude by discussing how the contemporary political and institutional environment of AR4D produces project beneficiaries and research outcomes on selected farms, but not necessarily impacts at scale.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

Review Agriculture, Multidisciplinary

Affordances of agricultural systems analysis tools: A review and framework to enhance tool design and implementation

Lenora Ditzler, Laurens Klerkx, Jacqueline Chan-Dentoni, Helena Posthumus, Timothy J. Krupnik, Santiago Lopez Ridaura, Jens A. Andersson, Frederic Baudron, Jeroen C. J. Groot

AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS (2018)

Review Agronomy

INNOVATION PLATFORMS IN AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH FOR DEVELOPMENT Ex-ante Appraisal of the Purposes and Conditions Under Which Innovation Platforms can Contribute to Agricultural Development Outcomes

Marc Schut, Josey Kamanda, Andreas Gramzow, Thomas Dubois, Dietmar Stoian, Jens A. Andersson, Iddo Dror, Murat Sartas, Remco Mur, Shinan Kassam, Herman Brouwer, Andre Devaux, Claudio Velasco, Rica Joy Flor, Martin Gummert, Djuna Buizer, Cynthia McDougall, Kristin Davis, Sabine Homann-Kee Tui, Mark Lundy

EXPERIMENTAL AGRICULTURE (2019)

Article Multidisciplinary Sciences

Capturing farm diversity with hypothesis-based typologies: An innovative methodological framework for farming system typology development

Stephanie Alvarez, Carl J. Timler, Mirja Michalscheck, Wim Paas, Katrien Descheemaeker, Pablo Tittonell, Jens A. Andersson, Jeroen C. J. Groot

PLOS ONE (2018)

Editorial Material Agronomy

ON-FARM TRIALS AS 'INFECTION POINTS'? A RESPONSE TO WALL ET AL.

J. A. Andersson, T. J. Krupnik, N. De Roo

EXPERIMENTAL AGRICULTURE (2019)

Editorial Material Agronomy

DOING DEVELOPMENT-ORIENTED AGRONOMY: RETHINKING METHODS, CONCEPTS AND DIRECTION

Jens A. Andersson, Ken E. Giller

EXPERIMENTAL AGRICULTURE (2019)

Review Agronomy

DOES SIZE MATTER? A CRITICAL REVIEW OF META-ANALYSIS IN AGRONOMY

Timothy J. Krupnik, Jens A. Andersson, Leonard Rusinamhodzi, Marc Corbeels, Carol Shennan, Bruno Gerard

EXPERIMENTAL AGRICULTURE (2019)

Review Agriculture, Multidisciplinary

Rethinking technological change in smallholder agriculture

Dominic Glover, James Sumberg, Giel Ton, Jens Andersson, Lone Badstue

OUTLOOK ON AGRICULTURE (2019)

Article Agriculture, Multidisciplinary

Science-based decision support for formulating crop fertilizer recommendations in sub-Saharan Africa

Jairos Rurinda, Shamie Zingore, Jibrin M. Jibrin, Tesfaye Balemi, Kenneth Masuki, Jens A. Andersson, Mirasol F. Pampolino, Ibrahim Mohammed, James Mutegi, Alpha Y. Kamara, Bernard Vanlauwe, Peter Q. Craufurd

AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS (2020)

Article Agronomy

Reproducibility and external validity of on-farm experimental research in Africa

Hanna Kool, Jens A. Andersson, Ken E. Giller

EXPERIMENTAL AGRICULTURE (2020)

Article Agriculture, Multidisciplinary

Adapting yet not adopting? Conservation agriculture in Central Malawi

T. I. Bouwman, J. A. Andersson, K. E. Giller

Summary: Despite relatively high adoption rates in Central Malawi, farmers in the region did not fully adhere to the three conservation agriculture principles. The practice of adding mulch was found to increase yields, but it was not scalable, and overall did not provide substantial benefits for farm productivity, labor savings, or soil conservation.

AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT (2021)

Article Agriculture, Multidisciplinary

Regenerative Agriculture: An agronomic perspective

Ken E. Giller, Renske Hijbeek, Jens A. Andersson, James Sumberg

Summary: Regenerative Agriculture is gaining prominence as a solution to the crises facing agriculture, but there are controversies surrounding some of its practices. It draws support from various sectors but also raises questions about the context-specific benefits. The resurgence of interest in Regenerative Agriculture represents a re-framing of approaches to agricultural futures but may also contribute to confusion in the public debate.

OUTLOOK ON AGRICULTURE (2021)

Review Food Science & Technology

The future of farming: Who will produce our food?

Ken E. Giller, Thomas Delaune, Joao Vasco Silva, Katrien Descheemaeker, Gerrie van de Ven, Antonius G. T. Schut, Mark van Wijk, James Hammond, Zvi Hochman, Godfrey Taulya, Regis Chikowo, Sudha Narayanan, Avinash Kishore, Fabrizio Bresciani, Heitor Mancini Teixeira, Jens A. Andersson, Martin K. van Ittersum

Summary: Achieving SDG2 requires continued focus on food production and understanding the complex interrelations between farms and farming systems of different scales and methods globally. The bewildering diversity of farming systems worldwide and the economic viability of agriculture are key challenges to be addressed in achieving zero hunger.

FOOD SECURITY (2021)

Article Food Science & Technology

Small farms and development in sub-Saharan Africa: Farming for food, for income or for lack of better options?

Ken E. Giller, Thomas Delaune, Joao Vasco Silva, Mark van Wijk, James Hammond, Katrien Descheemaeker, Gerrie van de Ven, Antonius G. T. Schut, Godfrey Taulya, Regis Chikowo, Jens A. Andersson

Summary: Most food in sub-Saharan Africa is produced on small farms, with the majority of farms less than 1 hectare. Analyzing data from household surveys in Ethiopia, Ghana, Mali, Malawi, Tanzania, and Uganda reveals significant differences in food security and household incomes among households in different farming systems. The study highlights the interplay between population density, farm size, market access, and agroecological potential on food security and income levels.

FOOD SECURITY (2021)

Article Development Studies

Herbicide Induced Hunger? Conservation Agriculture,GanyuLabour and Rural Poverty in Central Malawi

T. I. Bouwman, J. A. Andersson, K. E. Giller

Summary: The increasing use of herbicides in sub-Saharan Africa has led to negative impacts on casual labor relations, such as reduced job opportunities and increased hunger in rural households in Central Malawi. While herbicides benefit the better-off, they come at the expense of the poor and food insecure, highlighting the importance of considering social equity implications in agricultural development initiatives.

JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENT STUDIES (2021)

No Data Available