4.2 Article

The Effect of Selective Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation with Functional Near-Infrared Spectre scopy and Intensive Speech Therapy on Individuals with Post-Stroke Aphasia

Journal

EUROPEAN NEUROLOGY
Volume 77, Issue 3-4, Pages 186-194

Publisher

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000457901

Keywords

Aphasia; Neuroimaging; Stroke; Near-infrared spectroscopy; Transcranial magnetic stimulation

Funding

  1. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [15K16371] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: To examine the efficacy of selective repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) therapy guided by functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) combined with intensive speech therapy (iST) on post-stroke patients with aphasia. Material and Methods: Eight right-handed patients with aphasia in the chronic stage after stroke were grouped into left and right hemisphere-activated for a language task based on pre-intervention fNIRS. Those with left hemisphere activation received 1-Hz TMS to the right inferior frontal gyrus (RtIFG; low-frequency rTMS [LFS] group), and those with right hemisphere activation received 10-Hz TMS to the RtIFG (high-frequency rTMS [HFS] group). The patients underwent an 11-day program of rTMS and iST. Results: Both groups showed a significant improvement in language function as measured by Standard Language Test of Aphasia (SLTA) total score at post-intervention relative to pre-intervention. Furthermore, the pre-to-post SLTA change scores were not statistically different between the groups. Comparison of pre- and post-intervention fNIRS revealed a resolution of the imbalance of interhemispheric inhibition in the LFS group and activation of the target hemisphere in the HFS group. Conclusions: The administration of fNIRS-guided selective rTMS therapy and iST to post-stroke patients with aphasia induced a significant improvement in language function, with both groups demonstrating a similar degree of improvement. (C) 2017 S. Karger AG, Basel

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available