4.2 Article

Diagnostic value of arterial blood gas lactate concentration in the different forms of mesenteric ischemia

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF TRAUMA AND EMERGENCY SURGERY
Volume 44, Issue 2, Pages 265-272

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00068-017-0805-7

Keywords

Intestinal infarction; Bowel ischemia; Mesenteric ischemia; Ischemic colitis; Lactate; Arterial blood gas

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The role of serum lactate measurement in patients with intestinal ischemia still remains unclear. The aim of this study was to prospectively evaluate the diagnostic performance of arterial blood gas lactate concentrations in the patients with acute mesenteric ischemia and its different forms. All the patients reporting abdominal pain associated with risk factors for mesenteric ischemia underwent arterial blood gas and contrast enhanced abdominal computer tomography (CT). At CT, 201 patients (70.7%) showed a nonischemic disease (group 1) and 83 patients (29.2%) showed findings of mesenteric ischemia. Out of these, 35 patients (42.1%) showed bowel ischemia secondary to non vascular causes (group 2) and 48 (57.8%) had a vascular intestinal ischemia (group 3). Out of these, 20 showed small bowel arterial occlusion (group 3a), 13 a small bowel nonocclusive ischemia (group 3b), 7 a venous small bowel occlusion (group 3c) and 8 showed isolated colonic ischemia (group 3d). The median lactate serum level was significantly higher in patients with vascular ischemia if compared with patients with nonischemic disease and secondary mesenteric ischemia (p < 0.0001; Kruskal-Wallis test). The areas under ROC curves for the lactate serum levels in the groups 2, 3, 3a, 3b, 3c and 3d were, respectively, 0.61, 0.85, 0.93, 0.93, 0.68 and 0.67. Arterial blood gas lactate levels seem to show good diagnostic accuracy in diagnosing small bowel arterial and nonocclusive ischemia and poor accuracy in diagnosing secondary mesenteric ischemia, small bowel venous ischemia and ischemic colitis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available