4.4 Article

Multi-layered simulations at the heart of workflow enactment on clouds

Journal

CONCURRENCY AND COMPUTATION-PRACTICE & EXPERIENCE
Volume 28, Issue 11, Pages 3180-3201

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/cpe.3733

Keywords

scientific workflow; Cloud computing; simulation toolkits

Funding

  1. Austrian Science fund [TRP 237-N23]
  2. EU under the COST programme Action, Network for Sustainable Ultrascale Computing (NESUS) [IC1305]
  3. EU [644179]
  4. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [TRP 237] Funding Source: researchfish
  5. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [TRP237] Funding Source: Austrian Science Fund (FWF)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Scientific workflow systems face new challenges when supporting Cloud computing, as the information on the state of the used infrastructures is much less detailed than before. Thus, organising virtual infrastructures in a way that not only supports the workflow execution but also optimises it for several service level objectives (e.g. maximum energy consumption limit, cost, reliability, availability) become reliant on good Cloud modelling and prediction information. While simulators were successfully aiding research on such workflow management systems, the currently available Cloud related simulation toolkits suffer from several issues (e.g. scalability and narrow scope) that hinder their applicability. To address these issues, this article introduces techniques for unifying two existing simulation toolkits by first analysing the problems with the current simulators, and then by illustrating the problems faced by workflow systems. We use for this purpose the example of the ASKALON environment, a scientific workflow composition and execution tool for cloud and grid environments. We illustrate the advantages of a workflow system with directly integrated simulation back-end and how the unification of the selected simulators does not affect the overall workflow execution simulation performance. Copyright (C) 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available