4.6 Article

Cardio-metabolic risk factors in youth with classical 21-hydroxylase deficiency

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS
Volume 176, Issue 4, Pages 537-545

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00431-017-2875-2

Keywords

Congenital adrenal hyperplasia; Metabolic syndrome; Adolescent; Body composition; Cardiovascular risk factors

Categories

Funding

  1. Ratchadapiseksompotch Fund [RA57/048]
  2. Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University
  3. Thailand Research Fund [IRG5780015]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Patients with congenital adrenal hyperplasia (CAH) appear to have adverse cardiovascular risk profile and other long-term health problems in adult life, but there are limited data in young CAH patients. We aim to evaluate the cardio-metabolic risk factors in adolescents and young adults with classical 21-hydroxylase deficiency (21-OHD). We performed a cross-sectional study of 21 patients (17 females) with classic CAH detected clinically and not through newborn screening, aged 15.2 +/- 5.8 years, and 21 healthy matched controls. Anthropometric, biochemical, inflammatory markers, and body composition using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry were measured. Obesity was observed in 33% of the CAH patients. The waist/hip ratio and waist/height ratio were significantly higher in CAH patients. Five out of 21 patients (24%) had elevated blood pressure. Silent diabetes was diagnosed in one patient (4.8%), but none in the control group. Serum leptin and interleukin-6 levels were not different between groups, but hs-CRP levels tended to be higher in CAH patients. Other metabolic profiles and body composition were similar in CAH and controls. Conclusion: Adolescents and young adults with CAH appear to have an increased risk of obesity and cardio-metabolic risk factors. Close monitoring, early identification, and secondary prevention should be implemented during pediatric care to improve the long-term health outcomes in CAH patients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available