4.7 Article

Supply chain coordination with information sharing: The informational advantage of GPOs

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH
Volume 256, Issue 3, Pages 785-802

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2016.06.045

Keywords

Supply chain management; Purchasing; Information sharing; Coordination; Quantity competition

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71272086, 71572020]
  2. Project Supported by Major Program of the National Social Science Foundation of China [15ZDB169]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper explores the potential of group purchasing organizations (GPOs) in facilitating information sharing and coordinating horizontal competition. We consider a supply chain composed of one GPO and two manufacturers competing in quantity. The GPO sources and prices a common component for the manufacturers. Each manufacturer has some private information about the uncertain demand, and can choose a part to share with the GPO. Through benchmark analysis, we identify the manufacturers' horizontal competition and information incompletion as two determinants of supply chain inefficiency under individual purchasing. Then, we investigate the impacts of the GPO on the supply chain with wholesale price contracts and show that double marginalization induced by the GPO is another determinant of inefficiency. For this, both manufacturers have no incentive to share information and group purchasing damages the supply chain. We also show that under group purchasing, information sharing partially from the lower-precision manufacturer rather than both can benefit the supply chain. Next, we present a forecast-sharing-based compensation contracting scheme, under which, the GPO can make perfect supply chain coordination in both quantities and information sharing, and all members in the supply chain can reach win-win results. Finally, we illustrate the GPO's informational advantage by numerical examples. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available