4.1 Article

Exploring halide anion affinities to native cyclodextrins by mass spectrometry and molecular modelling

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MASS SPECTROMETRY
Volume 24, Issue 3, Pages 269-278

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/1469066717748658

Keywords

Cyclodextrins; density functional calculation; halide anions; inclusion complexes; mass spectrometry

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21773035]
  2. National Ministry of Science and Technology of China
  3. National Science and Technology Support Program of China [2011YQ14015006, 2011YQ14014703]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The binding affinities of cyclodextrins complexation with chlorine (Cl-), bromine (Br-) and iodine (I-), were measured by mass spectrometric titrimetry, and the fitting of the binding constants was based on the concentration measurement of the cyclodextrin equilibrium. The binding constants (lg K-a) for alpha(-), beta(-) or gamma(-) cyclodextrin with Cl- were 3.99, 4.03 and 4.11, respectively. The gas-phase binding affinity of halide anions for native cyclodextrins was probed by collision-induced dissociation. In collision-induced dissociation, the centre-of-mass frame energy results revealed that in the gas phase, for the same type of cyclodextrin, the stability of the complexes decreased in order: Cl > Br > I, and for the same halide anion, the binding stability of the complex with alpha(-), beta(-) or gamma(-)cyclodextrin decreased in the order: gamma-cyclodextrin> beta-cyclodextrin> alpha-cyclodextrin. The density functional theory calculations showed that halide anion binding on the primary face had a lower energy than the secondary face and hydrogen bonding was the main driving force for complex formation. The higher stability of the gamma-cyclodextrin complex with the Cl anion can be attributed to the higher charge density of the Cl anion and better flexibility of gamma-cyclodextrin.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available