Transparency in literature reviews: an assessment of reporting practices across review types and genres in top IS journals
Published 2017 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Transparency in literature reviews: an assessment of reporting practices across review types and genres in top IS journals
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Volume -, Issue -, Pages 1-48
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Online
2018-01-10
DOI
10.1080/0960085x.2017.1398880
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- A Three-Perspective Model of Culture, Information Systems, and Their Development and Use
- (2017) Kappos et al. MIS QUARTERLY
- A Meta-Analysis of the Role of Environment-Based Voluntariness in Information Technology Acceptance
- (2017) Wu et al. MIS QUARTERLY
- Transdisciplinary Perspectives on Environmental Sustainability: A Resource Base and Framework for IT-Enabled Business Transformation
- (2017) Elliot MIS QUARTERLY
- Information Privacy Research: An Interdisciplinary Review
- (2017) Smith et al. MIS QUARTERLY
- Contextualizing the twin concepts of systematicity and transparency in information systems literature reviews
- (2016) Guy Paré et al. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SYSTEMS
- Unknown
- (2016) Research Synthesis Methods
- Synthesizing information systems knowledge: A typology of literature reviews
- (2015) Guy Paré et al. INFORMATION & MANAGEMENT
- Guidelines for conducting systematic mapping studies in software engineering: An update
- (2015) Kai Petersen et al. INFORMATION AND SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGY
- Skirting SLR’s language trap: reframing the ‘systematic’ vs ‘traditional’ literature review opposition as a continuum
- (2015) Ulrike Schultze JOURNAL OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
- Effects of Home Telemonitoring Interventions on Patients With Chronic Heart Failure: An Overview of Systematic Reviews
- (2015) Spyros Kitsiou et al. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH
- Skirting SLR’s language trap: reframing the ‘systematic’ vs ‘traditional’ literature review opposition as a continuum
- (2015) Ulrike Schultze JOURNAL OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
- What literature review is not: diversity, boundaries and recommendations
- (2014) Frantz Rowe EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SYSTEMS
- Evaluating meta-ethnography: systematic analysis and synthesis of qualitative research
- (2014) R Campbell et al. HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT
- On being ‘systematic’ in literature reviews in IS
- (2014) Sebastian K Boell et al. JOURNAL OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
- The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration
- (2013) Alessandro Liberati ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
- Toward a richer diversity of genres in information systems research: new categorization and guidelines
- (2012) Frantz Rowe EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SYSTEMS
- Revisiting IS business value research: what we already know, what we still need to know, and how we can get there
- (2012) Guido Schryen EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SYSTEMS
- A meta-analysis of the consequences of virtualness on team functioning
- (2012) Ana Ortiz de Guinea et al. INFORMATION & MANAGEMENT
- Beyond synthesis: re-presenting heterogeneous research literature
- (2011) Allan Sylvester et al. BEHAVIOUR & INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
- Methodology in conducting a systematic review of systematic reviews of healthcare interventions
- (2011) Valerie Smith et al. BMC Medical Research Methodology
- An historically grounded critical analysis of research articles in IS
- (2011) François-Xavier de Vaujany et al. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SYSTEMS
- Using grounded theory as a method for rigorously reviewing literature
- (2011) Joost F Wolfswinkel et al. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SYSTEMS
- Scoping studies: advancing the methodology
- (2010) Danielle Levac et al. Implementation Science
- Internet-based medical education: a realist review of what works, for whom and in what circumstances
- (2010) Geoff Wong et al. BMC Medical Education
- AMSTAR is a reliable and valid measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews
- (2009) Beverley J. Shea et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Positioning the institutional perspective in information systems research
- (2009) Muriel Mignerat et al. JOURNAL OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
- Can We Systematically Review Studies That Evaluate Complex Interventions?
- (2009) Sasha Shepperd et al. PLOS MEDICINE
- Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement
- (2009) David Moher et al. PLOS MEDICINE
- Measuring information systems success: models, dimensions, measures, and interrelationships
- (2008) Stacie Petter et al. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Publish scientific posters with Peeref
Peeref publishes scientific posters from all research disciplines. Our Diamond Open Access policy means free access to content and no publication fees for authors.
Learn MoreFind the ideal target journal for your manuscript
Explore over 38,000 international journals covering a vast array of academic fields.
Search