Determinants of change in polypharmacy status in Switzerland: the population-based CoLaus study
Published 2017 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Determinants of change in polypharmacy status in Switzerland: the population-based CoLaus study
Authors
Keywords
Polypharmacy, Determinants, Trends, General population, Switzerland
Journal
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY
Volume 73, Issue 9, Pages 1187-1194
Publisher
Springer Nature
Online
2017-06-21
DOI
10.1007/s00228-017-2288-1
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Validity of Self-Reported Medication Use Compared With Pharmacy Records in a Cohort of Older Women: Findings From the Women's Health Initiative
- (2016) Rebecca L. Drieling et al. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
- 2016 European Guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice
- (2016) Massimo F. Piepoli et al. EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL
- Trends in Prescription Drug Use Among Adults in the United States From 1999-2012
- (2015) Elizabeth D. Kantor et al. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
- Prevalence and Factors Associated With Polypharmacy in Long-Term Care Facilities: A Systematic Review
- (2015) Natali Jokanovic et al. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association
- Five year trends in dyslipidaemia prevalence and management in Switzerland: The CoLaus study
- (2015) P. Antiochos et al. NUTRITION METABOLISM AND CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES
- Trends and interaction of polypharmacy and potentially inappropriate prescribing in primary care over 15 years in Ireland: a repeated cross-sectional study
- (2015) Frank Moriarty et al. BMJ Open
- Is polypharmacy always hazardous? A retrospective cohort analysis using linked electronic health records from primary and secondary care
- (2014) Rupert A. Payne et al. BRITISH JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY
- Going beyond the numbers - a call to redefine polypharmacy
- (2014) Carmel M. Hughes et al. BRITISH JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY
- Prevalence of polypharmacy in a Scottish primary care population
- (2014) R. A. Payne et al. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY
- Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus
- (2013) DIABETES CARE
- 2013 ESH/ESC Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension
- (2013) EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL
- Characteristics of polymedicated (≥ 4) elderly: A survey in a community-dwelling population aged 60 years and over
- (2013) N. Husson et al. Journal of Nutrition Health & Aging
- Polypharmacy Patterns: Unravelling Systematic Associations between Prescribed Medications
- (2013) Amaia Calderón-Larrañaga et al. PLoS One
- Polypharmacy cutoff and outcomes: five or more medicines were used to identify community-dwelling older men at risk of different adverse outcomes
- (2012) Danijela Gnjidic et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Epidemiology of multimorbidity and implications for health care, research, and medical education: a cross-sectional study
- (2012) Karen Barnett et al. LANCET
- Gender Differences in Utilization of Preventive Care Services in the United States
- (2011) Varun Vaidya et al. JOURNAL OF WOMENS HEALTH
- Cardiovascular risk factors attributable to obesity and overweight in Switzerland
- (2011) C. Davin et al. NUTRITION METABOLISM AND CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES
- Prescribed-drug utilization and polypharmacy in a general population in Greece: association with sociodemographic, health needs, health-services utilization, and lifestyle factors
- (2010) E. Pappa et al. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY
- The challenge of polypharmacy in cardiovascular medicine
- (2009) Massimo Volpe et al. FUNDAMENTAL & CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY
- The CoLaus study: a population-based study to investigate the epidemiology and genetic determinants of cardiovascular risk factors and metabolic syndrome
- (2008) Mathieu Firmann et al. BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
Become a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get StartedAsk a Question. Answer a Question.
Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.
Get Started