Standard vs. intensified management of heart failure to reduce healthcare costs: results of a multicentre, randomized controlled trial
Published 2017 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Standard vs. intensified management of heart failure to reduce healthcare costs: results of a multicentre, randomized controlled trial
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL
Volume 38, Issue 30, Pages 2340-2348
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Online
2017-04-27
DOI
10.1093/eurheartj/ehx259
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Comparative effectiveness of transitional care services in patients discharged from the hospital with heart failure: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
- (2017) Harriette G.C. Van Spall et al. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEART FAILURE
- Impact of Nurse-Led, Multidisciplinary Home-Based Intervention on Event-Free Survival Across the Spectrum of Chronic Heart DiseaseCLINICAL PERSPECTIVE
- (2016) Simon Stewart et al. CIRCULATION
- Fluid status telemedicine alerts for heart failure: a randomized controlled trial
- (2016) Michael Böhm et al. EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL
- 2016 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure
- (2016) Piotr Ponikowski et al. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEART FAILURE
- Establishing a pragmatic framework to optimise health outcomes in heart failure and multimorbidity (ARISE-HF): A multidisciplinary position statement
- (2016) Simon Stewart et al. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY
- Effectiveness of Remote Patient Monitoring After Discharge of Hospitalized Patients With Heart Failure
- (2016) Michael K. Ong et al. JAMA Internal Medicine
- Cost-effectiveness of home versus clinic-based management of chronic heart failure: Extended follow-up of a pragmatic, multicentre randomized trial cohort — The WHICH? study (Which Heart Failure Intervention Is Most Cost-Effective & Consumer Friendly in Reducing Hospital Care)
- (2015) Shoko Maru et al. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY
- Transitional Care Interventions to Prevent Readmissions for Persons With Heart Failure
- (2014) Cynthia Feltner et al. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
- Prolonged impact of home versus clinic-based management of chronic heart failure: Extended follow-up of a pragmatic, multicentre randomized trial cohort
- (2014) Simon Stewart et al. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY
- Multimorbidity in Older Adults
- (2013) M. E. Salive EPIDEMIOLOGIC REVIEWS
- The annual global economic burden of heart failure
- (2013) Christopher Cook et al. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY
- The Green, Amber, Red Delineation of Risk and Need (GARDIAN) management system: a pragmatic approach to optimizing heart health from primary prevention to chronic disease management
- (2012) Melinda J Carrington et al. European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing
- Impact of Home Versus Clinic-Based Management of Chronic Heart Failure
- (2012) Simon Stewart et al. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY
- Development and preliminary testing of the new five-level version of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L)
- (2011) M. Herdman et al. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH
- CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials
- (2010) Kenneth F Schulz et al. BMC Medicine
- The European Heart Failure Self-care Behaviour scale revised into a nine-item scale (EHFScB-9): a reliable and valid international instrument
- (2009) Tiny Jaarsma et al. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEART FAILURE
- Effect of Moderate or Intensive Disease Management Program on Outcome in Patients With Heart FailureCoordinating Study Evaluating Outcomes of Advising and Counseling in Heart Failure (COACH)
- (2008) Tiny Jaarsma ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
Publish scientific posters with Peeref
Peeref publishes scientific posters from all research disciplines. Our Diamond Open Access policy means free access to content and no publication fees for authors.
Learn MoreAsk a Question. Answer a Question.
Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.
Get Started