4.6 Article

Study on the interaction between typical phthalic acid esters (PAEs) and human haemoglobin (hHb) by molecular docking

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL TOXICOLOGY AND PHARMACOLOGY
Volume 53, Issue -, Pages 206-211

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.etap.2017.06.008

Keywords

Phthalic acid esters; Human haemoglobin; Molecule docking; Binding force; Binding position

Funding

  1. Shandong Provincial Natural Science Foundation, China [ZR2014BQ033]
  2. Guangzhou Key Laboratory of Environmental Exposure and Health [GZKLEEH201613]
  3. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2013M540297]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This work has evaluated the binding force between hHb and typcial PAEs (DMP, DEP, DPRP, DBP, DIBP, DHP and DPHP) using molecule docking technique. The DPHP with 3 aromatic rings has the strongest binding (-Delta G(binding): 6.0 kcal mol(-1)) than other PAEs (-Delta G(binding): 2.91 similar to 4.48 kcal mol(-1)). The DMP with the lowest molecular weight has a high binding-force (-Delta G(binding): 4.48 kcal mol(-1)), while the DHP with the highest molecular weight has the lowest binding force (-Delta G(binding): 2.91 kcal mol(-1)). When the length of side chain increases, the binding force trend to decrease, regarding the VDW forces and H-bonding. The lgK(ow)-Delta G(binding) plotting figure shows that a higher K-ow value is accompanied by a lower binding force. The aromatic ring existed in PAEs largely increases the binding force between the hHb and the PAEs. On the other hand, the PAEs with higher number of carbon, meaning a higher hydrophobicity, can enter into the hydrophobic space of hHb centre deeper and bond to different position. The aromatic ring decreases the depth of binding position in the hydrophobic space. This work provides basic data and a theoretical method to assess the transport and accumulation of PAEs in human body, and the cytotoxicity of PAEs to hBRCs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available