4.7 Article

Kinetic simulation and prediction of pyrolysis process for non-metallic fraction of waste printed circuit boards by discrete distributed activation energy model compared with isoconversional method

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH
Volume 25, Issue 4, Pages 3636-3646

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-017-0763-y

Keywords

Wasteprintedcircuitboards(WPCBs); Non-metallicfraction(NMF); Thermogravimetricanalysis(TGA); Pyrolysis; Kinetic

Funding

  1. Project of Innovative and Interdisciplinary Team of HUST [2015ZDTD027]
  2. WuHan Yellow Crane Talents (Science) Program
  3. Foundation of State Key Laboratory of Coal Combustion [FSKLCCA1604]
  4. Project of Dongjiang Environment, Co., Ltd.

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Kinetic studies on the pyrolysis process for non-metallic fraction (NMF) of waste printed circuit boards (WPCBs) were conducted using both the isoconversional SKAS method and the discrete distributed activation energy model (discrete DAEM). The pyrolysis process of the NMF sample could be classified into three stages, and a large mass loss was observed from 98 to 570 degrees C, attributed to thermal degradation of epoxy resins in the NMF sample. The kinetic parameters, including activation energies (E-i), pre-exponential factors (A(i)), and contributed fractions (f(i,0)), were determined. It indicated that the discrete DAEM could predict the pyrolysis process of the NMF more accurately and completely when compared with the isoconversional SKAS method. In the discrete DAEM, E-i and A(i) values were evaluated at 99 equally spaced intervals of conversion. The E-i and A(i) (in the form of lnA(i)) transformed with reaction progress, ranging from 80.9 to 240.5 kJ/mol and 19.07 to 39.55 s(-1), respectively, with the conversion increased from 0.01 to 0.99. The pyrolysis of the NMF of WPCBs could be accurately characterized as 17 dominating reactions from f(i,0) results.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available