4.7 Article

Climate policy integration in the land use sector: Mitigation, adaptation and sustainable development linkages

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY
Volume 67, Issue -, Pages 35-43

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2016.11.004

Keywords

Mitigation; Adaptation; Climate policy integration; Forest; Agriculture; Indonesia

Funding

  1. Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) [ES/K00879X/1]
  2. Centre for Climate Change Economics and Policy (CCCEP) (ESRC grant) [ES/K006576/1]
  3. Australian Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade (AusAID Agreement) [63560]
  4. International Climate Initiative of the German Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation, Building and Nuclear Safety (BMUB)
  5. NORAD
  6. CGIAR Research Program on Forests, Trees and Agroforestry (CRP-FIA)
  7. CGIAR Fund
  8. Economic and Social Research Council [ES/K006576/1, ES/K00879X/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  9. ESRC [ES/K006576/1, ES/K00879X/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  10. NERC [NE/P014801/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article re-conceptualizes Climate Policy Integration-(CPI) in the land use sector to highlight the need to assess the level of integration of mitigation and adaptation objectives and policies to minimize tradeoffs and to exploit synergies. It suggests that effective CPI in the land use sector requires i) internal climate policy coherence between mitigation and adaptation objectives and policies; ii) external climate policy coherence between climate change and development objectives; iii) vertical policy integration to mainstream climate change into sectoral policies and; iv) horizontal policy integration by overarching governance structures for cross-sectoral coordination. This framework is used to examine CPI in the land use sector of Indonesia. The findings indicate that adaptation actors and policies are the main advocates of internal policy coherence. External policy coherence between mitigation and development planning is called for, but remains to be operationalized. Bureaucratic politics has in turn undermined vertical and horizontal policy integration. Under these circumstances it is unlikely that the Indonesian bureaucracy can deliver strong coordinated action addressing climate change in the land use sector, unless sectoral ministries internalize a strong mandate on internal and external climate policy coherence and find ways to coordinate policy action effectively. (C) 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available