4.7 Article

Fine particulate air pollution and hospital visits for asthma in Beijing, China

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION
Volume 230, Issue -, Pages 227-233

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2017.06.029

Keywords

Asthma; PM2.5; Air pollution; Hospitalization

Funding

  1. Key Project of Natural Science Funds of China [81230066]
  2. National Natural Science Fund Projects of China [81473043]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Data on fine particulate matter (PM2.5) in China were first announced in 2013. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the acute effects of PM2.5 on asthma morbidity in Beijing, China. A total of 978,658 asthma hospital visits consisting of 928,607 outpatient visits, 40,063 emergency room visits and 9988 hospital admissions from January 1, 2010, to June 30, 2012, were identified from the Beijing Medical Claim Data for Employees. A generalized additive Poisson model was applied to explore the association between PM2.5 and health service use. The mean daily PM2.5 concentration was 99.5 mu g/m(3) with a range from 7.2 mu g/m(3) to 492.8 mu g/m(3). Ambient PM2.5 concentration was significantly associated with increased use of asthma-related health services. Every 10 mu g/m(3) increase in PM2.5 concentration on the same day was significantly associated with a 0.67% (95% CI, 0.53%-0.81%), 0.65% (95% CI, 0.51%-0.80%), and 0.49% (95% CI, 0.35%-0.64%) increase in total hospital visits, outpatient visits and emergency room visits, respectively. The exposure response association between PM2.5 concentration and hospital visits for asthma exacerbations was approximately linear. In conclusion, this study found that short-term elevations in PM2.5 concentration may increase the risk of asthma exacerbations. Our findings contribute to the limited scientific literature concerning the acute effects of PM2.5 on asthma morbidity outcomes in developing countries. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available