Conventional and New Ways of Governing Forest Threats: A Study of Stakeholder Coherence in Sweden
Published 2017 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Conventional and New Ways of Governing Forest Threats: A Study of Stakeholder Coherence in Sweden
Authors
Keywords
Forest risk governance, Stakeholders, Structural factors, Policy acceptability, Threat appraisals, Trust
Journal
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
Volume 61, Issue 1, Pages 103-115
Publisher
Springer Nature
Online
2017-11-03
DOI
10.1007/s00267-017-0951-z
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Forest Owners' Response to Climate Change: University Education Trumps Value Profile
- (2016) Kristina Blennow et al. PLoS One
- Trust ecology and the resilience of natural resource management institutions
- (2015) Marc J. Stern et al. ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY
- How much management is enough? Stakeholder views on forest management in fire-prone areas in central Portugal
- (2015) Sandra Valente et al. FOREST POLICY AND ECONOMICS
- Exploring public perceptions of forest adaptation strategies in Western Canada: Implications for policy-makers
- (2015) Reem Hajjar et al. FOREST POLICY AND ECONOMICS
- Public Attitudes Toward Regulatory and Incentive Approaches to Private Forests: An Assessment and Comparison of Resident Segments in Georgia, USA
- (2015) Neelam C. Poudyal et al. FOREST SCIENCE
- Forest health and global change
- (2015) S. Trumbore et al. SCIENCE
- Stakeholder and Public Involvement in Risk Governance
- (2015) Ortwin Renn International Journal of Disaster Risk Science
- Public Acceptance of Wildland Fire and Fuel Management: Panel Responses in Seven Locations
- (2014) Eric Toman et al. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
- Adaptive co-management: How social networks, deliberation and learning affect legitimacy in carnivore management
- (2014) Carina Lundmark et al. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE RESEARCH
- Climate change and European forests: What do we know, what are the uncertainties, and what are the implications for forest management?
- (2014) Marcus Lindner et al. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
- Understanding Public Support for Forest Management and Economic Development Options after a Mountain Pine Beetle Outbreak
- (2014) Chad M. Kooistra et al. JOURNAL OF FORESTRY
- Why do forest owners fail to heed warnings? Conflicting risk evaluations made by the Swedish forest agency and forest owners
- (2014) Rolf Lidskog et al. SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF FOREST RESEARCH
- Increasing forest disturbances in Europe and their impact on carbon storage
- (2014) Rupert Seidl et al. Nature Climate Change
- Risk Perception and Responses Among Private Forest Owners in Sweden
- (2014) Louise Eriksson Small-Scale Forestry
- Citizens' view of legitimacy in the context of Finnish forest policy
- (2013) Annukka Valkeapää et al. FOREST POLICY AND ECONOMICS
- Salient Beliefs About Earthquake Hazards and Household Preparedness
- (2013) Julia S. Becker et al. RISK ANALYSIS
- Linking Local Perceptions to the Biophysical and Amenity Contexts of Forest Disturbance in Colorado
- (2012) Courtney Flint et al. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
- Public priorities for sustainable forest management in six forest dependent communities of British Columbia
- (2008) R.A. Kozak et al. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF FOREST RESEARCH
- The role of cultural models in local perceptions of SFM – Differences and similarities of interest groups from three boreal regions
- (2008) Kati Berninger et al. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
- Examining private forest policy preferences
- (2007) Jessica J. Janota et al. FOREST POLICY AND ECONOMICS
Find Funding. Review Successful Grants.
Explore over 25,000 new funding opportunities and over 6,000,000 successful grants.
ExploreBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started