4.1 Article

Molecular phylogeny of the tribe Erotini with description of a new genus from China (Coleoptera: Lycidae)

Journal

ENTOMOLOGICAL SCIENCE
Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages 213-223

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ens.12245

Keywords

East Asia; Lycinae; net-winged beetles; taxonomy

Categories

Funding

  1. National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program) [2013CB127605]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of China [31572052]
  3. Czech Science Foundation [P506/11/1757]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Erotini is a small tribe of net-winged beetles known from the northern temperate zone. We investigated relationships and limits of tribes and genera using a molecular phylogeny inferred from rrnL, cox1 and nad5 mtDNA fragments. Lopheros Leconte, 1881 and Pseudaplatopterus Kleine, 1940 were inferred in current molecular analyses as terminal lineages within Erotini. Therefore, we consider Lopherotini Kazantsev, 2012 and Pseudaplatopterina Kazantsev, 2012 as junior synonyms of Erotini Leconte, 1881. The Platycis genus group comprises 19 species representing several genus-group taxa previously placed in Platycis s. l. Konoplatycis Nakane, 1969 was recovered as a deeply rooted lineage of Erotini and we inferred another independent lineage for which we propose a new genus Sinoplatycis gen. nov. Additionally, we studied the diversity of Platycis s. l. in Asia, found their highest diversity in the temperate forest habitats of Eastern Asia and inferred the paraphyletic character of the subgenus Erotides s. str. Five new species are described from China: Sinoplatycis cardinalis sp. nov., S. zhani sp. nov. (type species of Sinoplatycis gen. nov.), Erotides brunnescens sp. nov., E. pusillus sp. nov. and E. slipinskii sp. nov. The molecular phylogeny shows deep splits of Japanese species with respect to the continental Eurasian fauna and the role of shallow seas and mountain systems in the diversification of the Platycis genus group.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available