4.7 Article

Geostatistical method for inferring RMR ahead of tunnel face excavation using dynamically exposed geological information

Journal

ENGINEERING GEOLOGY
Volume 228, Issue -, Pages 214-223

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.enggeo.2017.08.004

Keywords

Rock mass rating prediction; Spatial variability; Model uncertainty; Dynamic updating

Funding

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [NSFC 41272289, 41130751]
  2. Science and Technology Plan Project of the Ministry of Transport of China [2013318J02120]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for Central Universities

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Rock Mass Rating (RMR) is a rock mass classification system that is often used to select appropriate excavation methods and rock support systems in tunnel projects. This paper presents a geostatistical method for inferring RMR values quantitatively ahead of excavation of the tunnel face. The study makes full use of geological information exposed on excavated tunnel faces to capture the spatial correlation of rock mass quality and later predicts the RMR value using the kriging method. Predictions are constantly updated during the tunnel construction process. The advantages of the proposed method are as follows: (1) The RMR prediction uncertainty is quantified by accounting for spatial variability and model uncertainty; therefore, the resulting prediction can consider the geological conditions of the worst scenario; (2) The spatial variability of the geological condition is represented as a variogram model that is updated by observation data on the new excavated faces, and as the tunnel advances, the RMR prediction accuracy improves; and (3) The periodicity of geological conditions can be considered in RMR prediction. The proposed method is applied to a rock tunneling project, the Mingtang tunnel in Anhui province, China. The method achieves approximately 80% prediction accuracy; therefore, it has high potential as a tool for predicting RMR information ahead of tunnel face excavation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available