4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Combined analytical-numerical methodologies for the evaluation of mixed-mode (I plus II) fatigue crack growth rates in structural steels

Journal

ENGINEERING FRACTURE MECHANICS
Volume 185, Issue -, Pages 124-138

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2017.04.016

Keywords

Fatigue crack propagation; Mixed-mode; Stress intensity factor; Digital image correlation; Finite element method

Categories

Funding

  1. Portuguese Science Foundation (FCT) [SFRH/BPD/107825/2015, SFRH/BD/72434/2010]
  2. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [SFRH/BD/72434/2010] Funding Source: FCT

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper proposes an experimental study aiming to evaluate stress intensity factors (SIFs) for fatigue cracks propagating under pure mode I and mixed-mode I + II for a S235 structural steel. Compact tension (CT) specimens with a side hole were manufactured in order to generate a stress field, ahead of the crack tip, resulting in mixed-mode fatigue crack propagation. Specimens with distinct side hole locations were submitted to fatigue tests under stress controlled conditions for a stress ratio, R = 0.01. Fatigue tests were coupled with digital image correlation (DIC) to assess mode I and mode II SIF from full-field displacement measurements. Besides, DIC data was used to directly estimate the crack tip location during the test. A validation study was carried out by comparing this approach with regard to conventional optical measurements. Finite element simulations were also performed to validate the crack branching models and direct identification of SIF values. The proposed DIC approach was demonstrated to be an efficient tool for the automation of crack path detection and stress intensity factors computation. Mixed-mode fatigue crack data correlated well with pure mode I fatigue crack propagation data using the Paris law and an effective stress intensity factor as proposed by Tanaka. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available