4.7 Article

A geographically resolved method to estimate levelized power plant costs with environmental externalities

Journal

ENERGY POLICY
Volume 102, Issue -, Pages 491-499

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2016.12.025

Keywords

LCOE; Power plants; Regional/spatial data; Externalities; CO2; Methane leakage

Funding

  1. UT Austin's Energy Institute
  2. Austin Energy
  3. City Public Service Energy
  4. Sharyland Utilities
  5. Cynthia and George Mitchell Foundation
  6. Chevron
  7. Environmental Defense Fund
  8. Directorate For Engineering
  9. Div Of Chem, Bioeng, Env, & Transp Sys [1140000] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this analysis we developed and applied a geographically-resolved method to calculate the Levelized Cost of Electricity (LCOE) of new power plants on a county-by-county basis while including estimates of some environmental externalities. We calculated the LCOE for each county of the contiguous United States for 12 power plant technologies. The minimum LCOE option for each county varies based on local conditions, capital and fuel costs, environmental externalities, and resource availability. We considered ten scenarios that vary input assumptions. We present the results in a map format to facilitate comparisons by fuel, technology, and location. For our reference analysis, which includes a cost of $62/tCO(2) for CO2 emissions natural gas combined cycle, wind, and nuclear are most often the lowest-LCOE option. While the average cost increases when internalizing the environmental externalities (carbon and air pollutants) is small for some technologies, the local cost differences are as high as $0.62/kWh for coal (under our reference analysis). These results display format, and online tools could serve as an educational tool for stakeholders when considering which technologies might or might not be a good fit for a given locality subject to system integration considerations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available