4.7 Article

Optimal parameters of green roofs in representative cities of four climate zones in China: A simulation study

Journal

ENERGY AND BUILDINGS
Volume 150, Issue -, Pages 118-131

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2017.05.079

Keywords

Green roof; Optimal properties; Energy consumption; Comfort performance

Funding

  1. China National Key R&D Program Solutions to heating and cooling of buildings in the Yangtze river region [2016YFC0700306]
  2. Youth Science and Technology Innovation Team of Sichuan Province of Building Environment and Energy Efficiency [2015TD0015]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The energy performance of green roofs is influenced by many factors and the regulation differs significantly to each other in different climate zones. Previous research on green roofs confined to a single climate zone with a single set of properties, lacking comparative studies. In this study, a simulation was used for determination of the optimal parameter settings for green roofs in different climate zones. Firstly, a simulation model was established, and a field experiment examined the bias of the model. Leaf area index, plant height, and soil thickness were used as variables. Harbin, Beijing, Chongqing, and Guangzhou were selected as representative cities of four climate zones in China. For quantification of energy savings and indoor thermal comfort improvements, both cool and conventional roofs were simulated alongside green roofs for comparison. Optimal parameters of green roofs were found to be closely related to meteorological conditions in each city. In terms of energy savings, the recommended soil thickness and leaf area index in the four cities are 0.3 m and 0.5, respectively. The optimal plant height is 0.3 m, except in Beijing, where it is 0.1 m. Optimized green roofs are recommended for heating-dominated cities, while cool and green roofs perform similarly in cooling-dominated areas. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available