4.7 Article

Investigation of the internal behavior in segmented PEMFCs of different flow fields during cold start process

Journal

ENERGY
Volume 123, Issue -, Pages 367-377

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2017.01.138

Keywords

PEMFC; Cold start; Flow fields; Segmented cell technology; Rapid cold start strategy

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21276199, 21310102016]
  2. Young Talents Climbing Program of Tongji University
  3. National Key Scientific Instrument and Equipment Development Special Fund [2012YQ150256]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
  5. 111 Project [B08019]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, we have researched the internal behavior in segmented proton exchange membrane fuel cells (PEMFCs) with three different flow fields during cold start process. The change of internal current density and temperature in fuel cells with different flow fields could be obviously shown by the printed circuit board (PCB) technology, and the study shows that the flow field is significant for enhancing the cold start ability and durability. Single serpentine flow field has the best cold start performance, while triple channel serpentine flow field has the best uniformity. It is found that without a robust temperature rising tendency, the cell temperature reaching 0 degrees C does not definitely mean a successful cold start because the cell temperature might drop down 0 degrees C again. Polarization curves show that there is almost no performance degradation after successful cold start, but the cell degrades quickly after the failed cold start at 7 degrees C and 10 degrees C. Based on these characteristics, we optimized the rapid cold start strategy by using electric heating and make it possible to start up the PEMFC at temperatures down to 20 degrees C within about 11 min. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available