4.5 Article

Solidification/stabilization of simulated cadmium-contaminated wastes with magnesium potassium phosphate cement

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING RESEARCH
Volume 21, Issue 1, Pages 15-21

Publisher

KOREAN SOC ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERS
DOI: 10.4491/eer.2015.092

Keywords

Cd; Magnesium potassium phosphate cement (MKPC); Municipal solid waste incineration fly ash (MSWI FA); Solidification/Stabilization (S/S)

Funding

  1. Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of the People's Republic of China research and development [2012-K4-21, 2011-K4-23, 2013-K7-4, 2013-K4-4, 2011-R2-24]
  2. China Building Materials Industry Association technology innovation [2013-M5-2]
  3. Department of Science and technology of Jiangsu projects [BY2013057-05]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Magnesium potassium phosphate cement (MKPC) is an effective agent for solidification/stabilization (S/S) technology. To further explore the mechanism of the S/S by MKPC, two kinds of Cd including Cd(NO3)(2) solution (L-Cd) and municipal solid waste incineration fly ash (MSWI FA) adsorbed Cd (S-Cd), were used to compare the effects of the form of heavy metal on S/S. The results showed that all the MKPC pastes had a high unconfined compressive strength (UCS) above 11 MPa. For L-Cd pastes, Cd leaching concentration increased with the increase of Cd content, and decreased with the increase of curing time. With the percentage of MSWI FA below 20%, S-Cd pastes exhibited similar Cd leaching concentrations as those of L-Cd pastes, while when the content of MSWI FA come up to 30%, the Cd leaching concentration increased significantly. To meet the standard GB5085.3-2007, the highest addition of S-Cd was 30% MSWI FA (6% Cd contained), with the Cd leaching concentration of 0.817 mg/L. The S/S of L-Cd is mainly due to chemical fixation, and the hydration compound of Cd was NaCdPO4, while the S/S of S-Cd is due to physical encapsulation, which is dependent on the pore/crack size and porosity of the MKPC pastes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available