Difference-in-Differences Method in Comparative Effectiveness Research: Utility with Unbalanced Groups
Published 2016 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Difference-in-Differences Method in Comparative Effectiveness Research: Utility with Unbalanced Groups
Authors
Keywords
Multiple Sclerosis, Propensity Score Match, Glatiramer Acetate, Fingolimod, Control Cohort
Journal
Applied Health Economics and Health Policy
Volume 14, Issue 4, Pages 419-429
Publisher
Springer Nature
Online
2016-07-02
DOI
10.1007/s40258-016-0249-y
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Shifting management of a community volunteer system for improved child health outcomes: results from an operations research study in Burundi
- (2015) Jennifer Weiss et al. BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Protocol for the evaluation of a social franchising model to improve maternal health in Uttar Pradesh, India
- (2015) Shreya K. Pereira et al. Implementation Science
- The Effect of Emergency Department Copayments for Medicaid Beneficiaries Following the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005
- (2015) Mona Siddiqui et al. JAMA Internal Medicine
- The Effect of a Diabetes Collaborative Care Management Program on Clinical and Economic Outcomes in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes
- (2015) Carrie McAdam-Marx et al. Journal of Managed Care & Specialty Pharmacy
- Design of an impact evaluation using a mixed methods model – an explanatory assessment of the effects of results-based financing mechanisms on maternal healthcare services in Malawi
- (2014) Stephan Brenner et al. BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Association of the 2011 ACGME Resident Duty Hour Reforms With Mortality and Readmissions Among Hospitalized Medicare Patients
- (2014) Mitesh S. Patel et al. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
- Association of the 2011 ACGME Resident Duty Hour Reform With General Surgery Patient Outcomes and With Resident Examination Performance
- (2014) Ravi Rajaram et al. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
- Methods for Evaluating Changes in Health Care Policy
- (2014) Justin B. Dimick et al. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
- Impact of the Non-Contributory Social Pension Program 70 y más on Older Adults’ Mental Well-Being
- (2014) Aarón Salinas-Rodríguez et al. PLoS One
- Propensity-Score Matching in Economic Analyses: Comparison with Regression Models, Instrumental Variables, Residual Inclusion, Differences-in-Differences, and Decomposition Methods
- (2014) William H. Crown Applied Health Economics and Health Policy
- An Introduction to Propensity Score Methods for Reducing the Effects of Confounding in Observational Studies
- (2011) Peter C. Austin MULTIVARIATE BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH
- Observational Methods in Comparative Effectiveness Research
- (2010) John Concato et al. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
- Medical chart validation of an algorithm for identifying multiple sclerosis relapse in healthcare claims
- (2010) Benjamin J. Chastek et al. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ECONOMICS
- Some Methods of Propensity-Score Matching had Superior Performance to Others: Results of an Empirical Investigation and Monte Carlo simulations
- (2009) Peter C. Austin BIOMETRICAL JOURNAL
- A critical appraisal of propensity-score matching in the medical literature between 1996 and 2003
- (2007) Peter C. Austin STATISTICS IN MEDICINE
Create your own webinar
Interested in hosting your own webinar? Check the schedule and propose your idea to the Peeref Content Team.
Create NowBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started