Choice Experiments to Quantify Preferences for Health and Healthcare: State of the Practice
Published 2016 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Choice Experiments to Quantify Preferences for Health and Healthcare: State of the Practice
Authors
Keywords
Choice Experiment, Choice Task, Attribute Level, Conjoint Analysis, Fractional Factorial Design
Journal
Applied Health Economics and Health Policy
Volume 14, Issue 3, Pages 253-266
Publisher
Springer Nature
Online
2016-03-19
DOI
10.1007/s40258-016-0232-7
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Incorporating patient-preference evidence into regulatory decision making
- (2015) Martin P. Ho et al. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES
- Pediatricians’ Preferences for Infant Meningococcal Vaccination
- (2015) Christine Poulos et al. VALUE IN HEALTH
- Patient-centric HTA: different strokes for different folks
- (2015) Axel C Mühlbacher Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research
- Reduce Mortality Risk Above All Else: A Discrete-Choice Experiment in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients
- (2014) Axel C. Mühlbacher et al. PHARMACOECONOMICS
- Sample size requirements for stated choice experiments
- (2013) John M. Rose et al. TRANSPORTATION
- Constructing Experimental Designs for Discrete-Choice Experiments: Report of the ISPOR Conjoint Analysis Experimental Design Good Research Practices Task Force
- (2013) F. Reed Johnson et al. VALUE IN HEALTH
- Patient Preferences Versus Physicians’ Judgement: Does it Make a Difference in Healthcare Decision Making?
- (2013) Axel C. Mühlbacher et al. Applied Health Economics and Health Policy
- Deriving distributional weights for QALYs through discrete choice experiments
- (2011) Emily Lancsar et al. JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS
- Eliciting Benefit–Risk Preferences and Probability-Weighted Utility Using Choice-Format Conjoint Analysis
- (2011) George Van Houtven et al. MEDICAL DECISION MAKING
- Conjoint Analysis Applications in Health—a Checklist: A Report of the ISPOR Good Research Practices for Conjoint Analysis Task Force
- (2011) John F.P. Bridges et al. VALUE IN HEALTH
- Does the number of choice sets matter? Results from a web survey applying a discrete choice experiment
- (2010) Mickael Bech et al. HEALTH ECONOMICS
- Using Conjoint Analysis and Choice Experiments to Estimate QALY Values
- (2010) Terry N. Flynn PHARMACOECONOMICS
- Preferences for treatment of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD): a discrete choice experiment
- (2009) Axel C Mühlbacher et al. BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Hypothetical bias, cheap talk, and stated willingness to pay for health care
- (2009) Semra Özdemir et al. JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS
- Mothers’ preferences and willingness to pay for vaccinating daughters against human papillomavirus
- (2009) Derek S. Brown et al. VACCINE
- Effects of simplifying choice tasks on estimates of taste heterogeneity in stated-choice surveys
- (2009) F. Reed Johnson et al. SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE
- Benefits, Risk, and Uncertainty: Preferences of Antiretroviral-Naïve African Americans for HIV Treatments
- (2008) A. Brett Hauber et al. AIDS PATIENT CARE AND STDS
- Conducting Discrete Choice Experiments to Inform Healthcare Decision Making
- (2008) Emily Lancsar et al. PHARMACOECONOMICS
- Some open combinatorial problems in the design of stated choice experiments
- (2007) Deborah J. Street et al. DISCRETE MATHEMATICS
Discover Peeref hubs
Discuss science. Find collaborators. Network.
Join a conversationPublish scientific posters with Peeref
Peeref publishes scientific posters from all research disciplines. Our Diamond Open Access policy means free access to content and no publication fees for authors.
Learn More