4.2 Article

25-Hydroxyvitamin D C3-epimer is universally present in neonatal Western Australian samples but is unlikely to contribute to diagnostic misclassification

Journal

ANNALS OF CLINICAL BIOCHEMISTRY
Volume 53, Issue 5, Pages 593-598

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/0004563215625693

Keywords

Vitamin D; C3-epimer; mass spectrometry; LC-MS/MS; cord blood

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background The presence of C3-epimer (C-3-epi-25-hydroxyvitamin D) in infant serum may complicate 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) measurement when using liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry assays that do not separately measure the epimer. We measured the concentration of C3-epi-25(OH)D in neonatal samples in Western Australian using umbilical cord blood samples and a liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry assay that separately quantifies 25(OH)D and C3-epi-25(OH)D. Methods A total of 120 anonymized cord blood samples were analysed using a liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry assay that utilizes two CSH fluoro-phenyl columns in series. Chromatography was performed on a Waters Acquity Ultra Performance Liquid system, and quantification was using a Waters Quattro Premier XE mass spectrometer. Results C3-epi-25(OH)D-3 was detected in all umbilical cord blood samples (median 5.2nmol/L, IQR 3.7-6.6nmol/L) and contributed 6.6% (SD 2.6, 95% CI [6.1, 7.1]) of the total 25(OH)D concentration. Mean 25(OH)D-3 measured in cord blood was 79.1nmol/L (SD 22.7nmol/L). A positive relationship (R-2=0.35, P<0.0005) between 25(OH)D-3 levels and C3-epi-25(OH)D-3 was noted in this cohort. No samples contained 25(OH)D-2 or C3-epi-25(OH)D-2. Conclusion C3-epi-25(OH)D-3 is present in all neonatal samples but contributes <10% of the total 25(OH)D concentration which is unlikely to be clinically significant. Liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry assays that do not separately quantify C3-epi-25(OH)D-3 from other vitamin D metabolites may potentially overestimate neonatal 25(OH)D levels, but diagnostic misclassification in neonates is unlikely.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available