4.5 Article

Modeling the magnetospheric X-ray emission from solar wind charge exchange with verification from XMM-Newton observations

Journal

JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SPACE PHYSICS
Volume 121, Issue 5, Pages 4158-4179

Publisher

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1002/2015JA022292

Keywords

charge exchange; magnetopause; terrestrial X-ray; XMM-Newton

Funding

  1. Air Force Office of Scientific Research, Air Force Material Command, USAF [FA9550-14-1-0200]
  2. STFC [ST/K001000/1]
  3. STFC [ST/K001000/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  4. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/K001000/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

An MHD-based model of terrestrial solar wind charge exchange (SWCX) is created and compared to 19 case study observations in the 0.5-0.7keV emission band taken from theEuropean Photon Imaging Cameras on board XMM-Newton. This model incorporates the Global Unified Magnetosphere-Ionosphere Coupling Simulation-4 MHD code and produces an X-ray emission datacube from O7+ and O8+ emission lines around the Earth using in situ solar wind parameters as the model input. This study details the modeling process and shows that fixing the oxygen abundances to a constant value reduces the variance when comparing to the observations, at the cost of a small accuracy decrease in some cases. Using the ACE oxygen data returns a wide ranging accuracy, providing excellent correlation in a few cases and poor/anticorrelation in others. The sources of error for any user wishing to simulate terrestrial SWCX using an MHD model are described here and include mask position, hydrogen to oxygen ratio in the solar wind, and charge state abundances. A dawn-dusk asymmetry is also found, similar to the results of empirical modeling. Using constant oxygen parameters, magnitudes approximately double that of the observed count rates are returned. A high accuracy is determined between the model and observations when comparing the count rate difference between enhanced SWCX and quiescent periods.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available