Journal
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES
Volume 121, Issue 14, Pages 8329-8349Publisher
AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1002/2016JD025166
Keywords
-
Categories
Funding
- Open Research Fund of State Key Laboratory of Desert and Oasis Ecology in Xinjiang Institute of Ecology and Geography, Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS)
- National Science Foundation of China [41401037, 41330529]
- National Key Research and Development Program of China [2016YFC0401401, 2016YFA0602402]
- CAS Pioneer Hundred Talents Program
- Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resource Research, CAS [Y5V50019YE]
- International Science and Technology Cooperation Program of China [2014DFA71910]
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Here we assess estimates of atmospheric evaporative demand over China in 12 state-of-the-art global climate models (GCMs) against observed D20 pan evaporation (E-pan) over the period of 1961-2000. To do that, we use an energy-relevant and physical-based approach, namely, PenPan model, to comprehensively evaluate GCM performance with respect to their ability to simulate annual, seasonal, and monthly statistics of E-pan (and its radiative and aerodynamic components, E-p,E-R and E-p,E-A). The results indicated that most GCMs generally captured the spatial pattern and seasonal cycle of E-pan, E-p,E-R, and E-p,E-A. However, regional means of annual and monthly E-pan, E-p,E-R, and E-p,E-A were underestimated by most GCMs mainly due to negatively biased surface air temperature (T-a) and vapor pressure deficit (vpd) outputted/simulated by the GCMs. Overall, the discrepancies among GCMs in estimating the regional statistics (regional means and seasonal cycles) of E-p,E-A were relatively larger than that of E-p,E-R, which indicates considerable uncertainties in the calculation of the aerodynamic component of evaporation based on the GCM outputs. Moreover, a few GCMs captured negative trends of regional mean annual and seasonal E-pan, E-p,E-R, and E-p,E-A well over the period of 1961- 2000, but most showed positive trends. The underestimation of net radiation (R-n) and overestimation of wind speed at 2m (u(2)) in most GCMs may, to some extent, accentuate/compensate the negative biases in GCM-estimated annual and seasonal E-pan, E-p,E-R, and E-p,E-A. The results demonstrate the importance of incorporating observation of pan evaporation and well-validated PenPan model to evaluate GCM performance on atmospheric evaporative demand that is relevant to projections of future drought and regional water-energy budgets.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available