4.6 Article

Effect of wire diameter on surface integrity of wire electrical discharge machined Inconel 706 for gas turbine application

Journal

JOURNAL OF MANUFACTURING PROCESSES
Volume 24, Issue -, Pages 170-178

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmapro.2016.09.001

Keywords

Inconel 706; WEDM; Microhardness; Topography; Microstructure; XRD

Funding

  1. Department of Science and Technology (DST), Government of India [SB/S3/MMER/0067/2013]
  2. DST

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Inconel 706 superalloy has established itself in the field of gas turbine industry because of its easy fabricability combined with high mechanical strength. Due to its high stress rupture and tensile yield strength, conventional machining of this superalloy exhibits poor surface and low dimensional accuracy of the machined components. It is well known that most of the gas turbine components include complex shaped profile with high precision and hence, wire electrical discharge machining (WEDM) of Inconel 706 has been performed to achieve the feasibility in manufacturing of complex shaped components for gas turbine application. In the current investigation, the effect of wire diameter on WEDM performance characteristics such as cutting speed, surface roughness, surface topography, recast layer formation, microhardness, microstructural and metallurgical changes have been evaluated. It was investigated that smaller diameter wire is advantageous over the larger diameter wire since it improves productivity as well as surface quality of the machined components under the same settings of control parameters. In addition, smaller diameter wire has shown comparatively lower recast layer thickness, minimum hardness alteration and shorter manufacturing time. The XRD result has confirmed the presence of residual stress within WED machined component. (C) 2016 The Society of Manufacturing Engineers. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available