Journal
ECOSYSTEM SERVICES
Volume 21, Issue -, Pages 81-91Publisher
ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.07.017
Keywords
Human well-being; Ecosystem services; Environmentalist's paradox; Rural population; South America
Categories
Funding
- CONICYT-Chile [FONDECYT 1120005]
Ask authors/readers for more resources
The main objective of this article is to analyse the relationship between human well-being (HWB) and ecosystem services (ES). We studied the Rio Cruces watershed (Chile) as a social-ecological system by means of a social survey and compared the results with those previously obtained at the Aysen watershed. We surveyed six localities characterized by different types of habitat. HWB was assessed by means of two indicators (material conditions and quality of life) and ES through the analysis of provisioning and regulating services. Results for Rio Cruces show no significant HWB differences between localities, with the exception of life satisfaction (lower on isolated localities). The use of provisioning and regulating services did not differ between localities, with the exception of two components (wood and soil fertility), and we only found a significant positive correlation between regulating services and HWB material conditions. The comparison between watersheds show that changes in HWB material conditions and both types of ES are positively correlated. We conclude that the relationship between human well-being and ecosystem services seems to be contextual to the analysed social-ecological system and that generalizations across systems may not be possible. (C)) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available