4.3 Article

Women's experiences of menopause in an online MS cohort: A case series

Journal

MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS AND RELATED DISORDERS
Volume 9, Issue -, Pages 56-59

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.msard.2016.06.015

Keywords

Quality of life; Multiple sclerosis; Hot flashes; Menopause; Patient-powered research networks; Online communities

Funding

  1. National Multiple Sclerosis Society/American Brain Foundation Clinician Scientist Award [FAN 1761-A-1]
  2. National Institutes of Health, United States, BIRWCH Scholar award [K12HD051959-09]
  3. National MS Society Harry Weaver Neuroscience Scholar Award Recipient

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Many women with multiple sclerosis (MS) are postmenopausal. Previously reported findings from an online MS cohort suggested that earlier, surgical menopause may be associated with higher patient-reported MS severity scores. Objective: To explore experiences of menopause in a series of MS women responding to a reproductive survey from an online research platform, PatientsLikeMe (PLM). Methods: The free-text responses from a detailed reproductive history survey deployed to PLM members were analyzed using grounded theory approach. Results: Of the 208 free text responses, 127 responses related to menopause. Five themes emerged: (1) perimenopausal onset of MS symptoms, (2) overlap of MS and menopausal symptoms, (3) MS exacerbations and pseudo-exacerbations triggered by hot flashes, (4) escalation of disease course after menopause, including increasing fatigue, cognitive disturbance, and other symptoms; and (5) effect of HRT on MS symptoms. Some women reported no effects of menopause or HRT. Conclusion: Given an aging population and a median age of individuals currently living with MS very close to menopausal age in many cohorts, there is a pressing need to understand the impact of menopause on MS course. Qualitative responses in this study illustrated several specific themes that require quantitative testing in clinic-based cohorts. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available