4.4 Article

Better management of wheat allergy using a very low-dose food challenge: A retrospective study

Journal

ALLERGOLOGY INTERNATIONAL
Volume 65, Issue 1, Pages 82-87

Publisher

JAPANESE SOC ALLERGOLOGY
DOI: 10.1016/j.alit.2015.07.011

Keywords

Disease management; Food allergy; Food hypersensitivity; Specific IgE; Wheat hypersensitivity

Funding

  1. Health and Labour Sciences Research Grants for Research on Allergic Disease and Immunology from the Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Low-dose reactive wheat-allergic children are at a high risk of a positive oral food challenge (OFC). The present study aimed to evaluate whether the results of a very low-dose (VL) OFC would contribute to better wheat allergy management in this population. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed wheat-allergic subjects who underwent a VL OFC with 2 g of udon noodles (equivalent to 53 mg of wheat protein) and had a previous allergic reaction to <15 g of udon noodles (equivalent to 400 mg of wheat protein) within 2 years before the OFC. Subjects who passed the OFC were defined as VL tolerant; those who failed were considered VL reactive. In VL tolerant subjects, the dose was increased to 15 g of udon noodles either during an OFC in our hospital or gradually at home. Results: Of the 57 included subjects (median age, 2.9 years; range, 1.0-11.8 years), 32 (56%) were VL tolerant and 25 (44%) were VL reactive. Most reactions during the OFC could be treated with an antihistamine and/or a nebulized beta 2 agonist. VL tolerant subjects consumed 2 g of udon noodles or a seasoning containing wheat. Within a year after the OFC, 18 VL tolerant subjects (56%), but no VL reactive subjects, were able to consume 15 g of udon noodles (p < 0.001). Conclusions: A VL OFC can shift the management of some low-dose reactive wheat-allergic children from complete avoidance to partial wheat intake. Copyright (C) 2015, Japanese Society of Allergology. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available