4.1 Article

GNSS Elevation-Dependent Stochastic Modeling and Its Impacts on the Statistic Testing

Journal

JOURNAL OF SURVEYING ENGINEERING
Volume 142, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

ASCE-AMER SOC CIVIL ENGINEERS
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)SU.1943-5428.0000156

Keywords

Global navigation satellite system (GNSS); Stochastic model; Reliability; Overall test; w-test

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Funds of China [41374031, 41574023, 41274035]
  2. State Key Laboratory of Geo-information Engineering [SKLGIE2013-M-2-2]
  3. China Special Fund for Surveying, Mapping and Geo-information Research in the Public Interest [HY14122136]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Only the correct stochastic model can be applied to derive the optimal parameter estimation and then realize the precision global navigation satellite system (GNSS) positioning. The key for refining the GNSS stochastic model is to establish the easy-to-use stochastic model that should capture the error characteristics adequately based on the estimated precisions from the real observations. In this paper, the authors study the GNSS elevation-dependent precision modeling and analyze its impact on the statistic testing involved in the adjustment reliability. With the zero-baseline dual-frequency Global Positioning System (GPS) data, the authors first estimate the elevation-dependent precisions and establish the stochastic models by fitting them with three predefined functions, including the unique precision function and the sine and exponential types of elevation-dependent functions. Three established models are then evaluated by their performance in the overall and w-statistic testing. The results indicated that the GNSS observation precisions are indeed elevation dependent, but this dependence differed from the observation types. The inadequate elevation-dependent model will result in the incorrect statistics and lead to larger wrong decisions, for instance, larger false alarms.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available