4.6 Article

FeOx@ carbon yolk/shell nanowires with tailored void spaces as stable and high-capacity anodes for lithium ion batteries

Journal

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY A
Volume 4, Issue 32, Pages 12487-12496

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/C6TA04351H

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NSFC [21401148]
  2. National 1000 Plan
  3. Ministry of Science and Technology of China through a 973-program [2012CB619401]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [xjj2013102, xjj2013043]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Transition metal oxides as anodes of lithium ion batteries (LIBs) promise high theoretical capacities. However, the significant volume change upon lithium insertion/extraction cycles causes pulverization of the materials, leading to a quick loss of electrical conductivity and a rapid decrease in capacity. The present work provides a possible solution to this problem by using a yolk/shell nanostructure featuring porous FeOx nanowires encapsulated with carbon shells as anodes. It was found that the FeOx@ carbon yolk-shell nanowires with a volumetric ratio (void/FeOx) of similar to 1.04 present high gravimetric and volumetric capacities of 1045.4 mA h g(-1) and 380.5 mA h cm(-3) at 0.2 A g(-1), respectively, a good rate capability at various current densities and a robust cycling stability. The appropriate void space plays a critical role in accommodating volume swing, preserving the structural integrity of porous FeOx nanowires, confining electroactive materials inside of carbon shells and maintaining good electrical contact between FeOx and carbon shells during the lithiation and delithiation cycling. However, if the void space is too small or too large, the structural damage of FeOx@C yolk/shell nanowires would occur attributed to a large volume expansion (similar to 90%) during lithiation/delithiation processes or the divulgation of the pulverized FeOx from carbon shells, respectively, leading to their poor performance as anodes of LIBs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available