4.4 Article

Personalized Travel Package With Multi-Point-of-Interest Recommendation Based on Crowdsourced User Footprints

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON HUMAN-MACHINE SYSTEMS
Volume 46, Issue 1, Pages 151-158

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/THMS.2015.2446953

Keywords

Location-based social networks (LBSNs); point-of-interest (POI) detection; travel package recommendation; travel route planning (TRP)

Funding

  1. National Basic Research Program of China [2012CB316400]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61222209, 61373119, 61332005]
  3. Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education [20126102110043]
  4. Innovation Foundation for Doctor Dissertation of Northwestern Polytechnical University [CX201522]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Location-based social networks (LBSNs) provide people with an interface to share their locations and write reviews about interesting places of attraction. The shared locations form the crowdsourced digital footprints, in which each user has many connections to many locations, indicating user preference to locations. In this paper, we propose an approach for personalized travel package recommendation to help users make travel plans. The approach utilizes data collected from LBSNs to model users and locations, and it determines users' preferred destinations using collaborative filtering approaches. Recommendations are generated by jointly considering user preference and spatiotemporal constraints. A heuristic search-based travel route planning algorithm was designed to generate travel packages. We developed a prototype system, which obtains users' travel demands from mobile client and generates travel packages containing multiple points of interest and their visiting sequence. Experimental results suggest that the proposed approach shows promise with respect to improving recommendation accuracy and diversity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available