4.6 Article

Classification of Exacerbation Frequency in the COPDGene Cohort Using Deep Learning With Deep Belief Networks

Journal

IEEE JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL AND HEALTH INFORMATICS
Volume 24, Issue 6, Pages 1805-1813

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/JBHI.2016.2642944

Keywords

Diseases; Hospitals; Machine learning; Lungs; Electronic mail; Gold; Feature extraction; Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD); deep belief network (DBN); deep learning; exacerbation; fisher score

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health (NIH) [R01EB013293, K01AG050711]
  2. NIH [R01HL089897, R01HL089856]
  3. NATIONAL HEART, LUNG, AND BLOOD INSTITUTE [R01HL089856, R01HL089897] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  4. NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON AGING [K01AG050711] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aims to develop an automatic classifier based on deep learning for exacerbation frequency in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). A three-layer deep belief network (DBN) with two hidden layers and one visible layer was employed to develop classification models and the models' robustness to exacerbation was analyzed. Subjects from the COPDGene cohort were labeled with exacerbation frequency, defined as the number of exacerbation events per year. A total of 10 300 subjects with 361 features each were included in the analysis. After feature selection and parameter optimization, the proposed classification method achieved an accuracy of 91.99%, using a ten-fold cross validation experiment. The analysis of DBN weights showed that there was a good visual spatial relationship between the underlying critical features of different layers. Our findings show that the most sensitive features obtained from the DBN weights are consistent with the consensus showed by clinical rules and standards for COPD diagnostics. We, thus, demonstrate that DBN is a competitive tool for exacerbation risk assessment for patients suffering from COPD.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available