4.6 Article

Quantitative methylation analysis reveals distinct association between PAX6 methylation and clinical characteristics with different viral infections in hepatocellular carcinoma

Journal

CLINICAL EPIGENETICS
Volume 8, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

BIOMED CENTRAL LTD
DOI: 10.1186/s13148-016-0208-3

Keywords

Hepatocellular carcinoma; DNA methylation; Q-MSP; PAX6; HCV

Funding

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan [MOST 104-2314-B-016-047, MOST 104-2321-B-016-003, MOST 103-2314-B-016-008]
  2. Ministry of National Defense, Taiwan [MAB-104-004, MAB-104-005, MAB-104-006, MAB-105-001, MAB-105-002, MAB-105-003]
  3. Liver Disease Prevention and Treatment Research Foundation, Taiwan, Republic of China

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Related to genetic alteration, frequent promoter hypermethylation is also a contributing factor in the development of human cancers. Recently, we discovered numerous novel genes that were aberrantly methylated in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) by using Infinium HumanMethylation27 BeadChip array. We utilized a quantitative methylation-specific PCR (Q-MSP) system for the evaluation of PAX6 methylation in 29 normal controls and 160 paired HCC tissues and their adjacent non-tumor tissues. We verified the correlation between the methylation status of PAX6 and clinical characteristics with different viral status. Results: Paired-box 6 promoter methylation was observed in 39.4 %, 15.6 %, and 3.4 % in primary HCCs, adjacent nontumors, and normal control tissues, respectively. Methylation of the PAX6 promoter region in HCCs significantly increased compared with control tissues. PAX6 was frequently methylated in HCV-positive HCC tissues (61.3 %) and rarely methylated in HBV-positive (22.1 %) and double-negative HCC tissues (33.3 %). Conclusions: Our data suggests that promoter hypermethylation of PAX6 is a common event in HCCs and the association of PAX6 methylation in clinicopathological features is divergent with different viral status.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available