4.3 Article

Sex differences in function and structure of the quadriceps muscle in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients

Journal

CHRONIC RESPIRATORY DISEASE
Volume 14, Issue 2, Pages 127-139

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/1479972316674412

Keywords

Women; peripheral muscles; muscle dysfunction; muscle damage; COPD

Funding

  1. FUCAP [09, 11]
  2. SEPAR [761]
  3. CIBERES
  4. [SAF2011-26908]
  5. [SAF2014-54371]
  6. [FIS 11/02029]
  7. [12/02534]
  8. [2014SGR424]
  9. [MTV3-07-1010]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a complex disorder with extrapulmonary manifestations. Even though there is some knowledge regarding sex differences in the lung disease, little is known about extrapulmonary manifestations. Our aim was to analyze the specific profile of muscle dysfunction, structure, and biology in COPD women. Twenty-one women and 19 men with stable COPD as well as 15 controls were included. Nutritional status, physical activity, lung and muscle function, exercise capacity, and quality of life were assessed. In addition, blood, breath condensate, and quadriceps muscle samples were tested for inflammatory markers. Moreover, fiber phenotype, signs of damage-regeneration, and the expression of key genes linked to myogenesis and inflammation were assessed in the muscle. Inflammatory markers were increased in all body compartments but no correlation was found among them. Muscle dysfunction was present in both COPD groups but was more marked in women. The opposite occurred with the increase in the percentage of type II fibers that was lower in women despite a similar level of airway obstruction as in men. Female COPD also showed higher signs of muscle damage than COPD men who, in contrast, exhibited slightly higher signs of regeneration. We conclude that sex influences muscle phenotype and function in COPD.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available