4.5 Article

Importance of Gaseous Elemental Mercury Fluxes in Western Maryland

Journal

ATMOSPHERE
Volume 7, Issue 9, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/atmos7090110

Keywords

gaseous elemental mercury; atmospheric mercury; dry deposition; atmospheric fluxes; background soils; annual fluxes

Funding

  1. University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The purpose of this study was to increase our understanding of the gaseous elemental mercury (GEM, Hg degrees) fluxes between the atmosphere and soils. Moreover, we wanted to quantify the annual GEM flux, identify the controls, and compare the GEM flux to annual rates of gaseous oxidized mercury (GOM) dry deposition and wet deposition of total mercury. We measured GEM fluxes using the modified Bowen ratio (MBR) technique from 6 July 2009 to 6 July 2010 in western Maryland. The annual hourly mean (+/- std. dev.) GEM flux was 0.63 +/- 31.0 ng center dot m(-2)center dot h(-1). Hourly mean GEM fluxes were not strongly correlated with atmospheric trace gases, aerosols, or meteorology. However, hourly mean GEM emissions (15.3 +/- 27.9 ng center dot m(-2)center dot h(-1)) and deposition ( 14.6 +/- 26.6 ng center dot m(-2)center dot h(-1)) were correlated with ultraviolet-B radiation (UV-B), wind speed (WS), ozone (O-3), and relative humidity (RH). The annual net GEM flux was 3.33 mu g center dot m(-2)center dot year(-1) and was similar to the annual dry deposition rate of GOM (2.5 to 3.2 mu g center dot m(-2)center dot year(-1)), and 40% less than the annual mean wet deposition (8 mu g center dot m(-2)center dot year(-1)) of total mercury. Thus, dry deposition of GEM accounted for approximately 25% of the total annual mercury deposition (similar to 14 mu g center dot m(-2)center dot year(-1)) measured at our study site.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available