4.5 Review

Unwinding the twister ribozyme: from structure to mechanism

Journal

WILEY INTERDISCIPLINARY REVIEWS-RNA
Volume 8, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/wrna.1402

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Austrian Science Fund FWF [I1040, P27947]
  2. Swiss National Foundation (SNF)
  3. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [P 27947, I 1040] Funding Source: researchfish
  4. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [I1040, P27947] Funding Source: Austrian Science Fund (FWF)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The twister ribozyme motif has been identified by bioinformatic means very recently. Currently, four crystal structures with ordered active sites together with a series of chemical and biochemical data provide insights into how this RNA accomplishes its efficient self-cleavage. Of particular interest for a mechanistic proposal are structural distinctions observed in the active sites that concern the conformation of the U-A cleavage site dinucleotide (in-line alignment of the attacking 2-O nucleophile to the to-be-cleaved PO5 bond versus suboptimal alignments) as well as the presence/absence of Mg2+ ions at the scissile phosphate. All structures support the notion that an active site guanine and the conserved adenine at the cleavage site are important contributors to cleavage chemistry, likely being involved in general acid base catalysis. Evidence for innersphere coordination of a Mg2+ ion to the pro-S nonbridging oxygen of the scissile phosphate stems from two of the four crystal structures. Together with the finding of thio/rescue effects for phosphorothioate substrates, this suggests the participation of divalent ions in the overall catalytic strategy employed by twister ribozymes. In this context, it is notable that twister retains wild-type activity when the phylogenetically conserved stem P1 is deleted, able to cleave a single nucleotide only. WIREs RNA 2017, 8:e1402. doi: 10.1002/wrna.1402 For further resources related to this article, please visit the .

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available