4.7 Article

Helicobacter pylori vacA Genotypes in Chronic Gastritis and Gastric Carcinoma Patients from Macau, China

Journal

TOXINS
Volume 8, Issue 5, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/toxins8050142

Keywords

Helicobacter pylori; vacA gene; genotyping; gastric carcinoma; China

Funding

  1. Fundo Europeu de Desenvolvimento Regional (FEDER) through Programa Operacional Factores de Competitividade (COMPETE)
  2. FCT-Fundacao para a Ciencia e a Tecnologia [FCOMP-01-0124-FEDER-021251 (PTDC/SAU-SAP/120024/2010)]
  3. FCT [SFHRH/BD/110803/2015, SFRH/BPD/84084/2012]
  4. Programa Operacional Capital Humano (POCH)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Helicobacter pylori is the major triggering factor for gastric carcinoma, but only a small proportion of infected patients develop this disease. Differences in virulence observed among H. pylori strains, namely in the vacuolating cytotoxin vacA gene, may contribute to this discrepancy. Infection with vacA s1, i1 and m1 strains increases the risk for progression of gastric premalignant lesions and for gastric carcinoma. However, in East Asian countries most of the H. pylori strains are vacA s1, regardless of the patients' clinical status, and the significance of the vacA i1 and m1 genotypes for gastric carcinoma in this geographic area remains to be fully elucidated. The aim of the present study was to investigate this relationship in 290 patients from Macau, China. Using very sensitive and accurate genotyping methods, we detected infection with vacA i1 and with vacA m1 strains in, respectively, 85.2% and 52.6% of the patients that were infected with single genotypes. The prevalence of cagA-positive strains was 87.5%. No significant associations were observed between vacA genotypes or cagA and gastric carcinoma. It is worth noting that 37.5% of the infected patients had coexistence of H. pylori strains with different vacA genotypes. Additional studies directed to other H. pylori virulence factors should be performed to identify high risk patients in East Asia.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available